From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: PVH domU patches.... Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:58:16 +0100 Message-ID: <51FA2328.2090806@citrix.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Keir Fraser Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/08/13 06:50, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 31/07/2013 22:43, "Mukesh Rathor" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I noticed the PVH domU patches are still not merged. Just wanna make >> sure nothing from me is waited upon. Please let me know. The latest >> tree with Tim's acks are at: >> >> git clone git://oss.oracle.com/git/mrathor/xen.git . >> git checkout pvh.v10.acked-1 >> >> >> Look forward to seeing them in the unstable tree soon :). > Jan has done the bulk of the review on these and deserves a final say. He is > on holiday until next week. > > -- Keir As for the tests I was running, I am happy to declare that there are no apparent regressions in PV / HVM operations as a result of the series. Therefore, a tentative PV-HVM-Regression-Tested-by: Andrew Cooper > >> thanks, >> Mukesh >