From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] HVM performance improvements Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 18:10:37 +0100 Message-ID: <51FFDC8D.9090406@citrix.com> References: <20130509140736.GK11427@reaktio.net> <20130805163104.GO2924@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130805163104.GO2924@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Keir Fraser , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/08/13 17:31, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:07:36PM +0300, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:41:31PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> This patch series contains the results of an investigation by XenServer >>> to try and reduce dom0 load during a VDI bootstorm. >>> >>> All patches reduce the number of polled IO traps to qemu that a booting >>> HVM domain uses. >>> >>> The patches are unmodified from the last time I posted them to the list, >>> but are presented now outside of a feature freeze. >>> >> It's feature freeze time again :) = >> >> Are these patches still necessary? for Xen 4.4? = >> > Xen 4.3 is now out of the door, so should these patches be considered for= Xen 4.4 ? = > > Thanks, > > -- Pasi > I would dearly love for these patches to finally go in. The patches likely apply as-are. ~Andrew