xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Atom2 <ariel.atom2@web2web.at>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Powerdown problem on XEN | ACPI S5
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:11:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520BF26D.2080901@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520BEE8D.3060704@web2web.at>

On 14/08/13 21:54, Atom2 wrote:
> Andrew,
> that does not sound too promising at the moment. Is there anything
> else I could provide to come to a resolution given that I/O
> virtualization is what the system is supposed to do.
>
> You mention ACPI tables - I have no clue how to provide those, but I
> am more than happy to do what I can?
>
> Ian (Campbell) originally diverted me to Jan (Beulich) who seemed to
> have an idea before you thankfully jumped in. Jan's idea seemed to
> also revolve around ACPI - although not tables, but registers:
>
> quote from Jan Beulich:
> > It would be particularly interesting to know whether perhaps
> > some of the ACPI registers live in memory space on that
> > system - I already have a patch queued up (but not submitted
> > yet) that fixes problems in that case.
>
> @Jan: would it make sense to go down that route?
>
> Thanks again to everybody for their help so far.

I would first start with the suggestion from Ben & Konrad, especially as
this smells the same in terms of breakage.

If that fails, you can get at the acpi tables using `acpidump` which
looks to live in the pmtools package in gentoo.

~Andrew

>
>
> Am 14.08.13 22:38, schrieb Andrew Cooper:
>> On 14/08/13 21:24, Atom2 wrote:
>>> Am 14.08.13 22:18, schrieb Andrew Cooper:
>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Ok thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Do you mind confirming whether S5 works with "iommu=off" on the Xen
>>>> command line?
>>>>
>>>> ~Andrew
>>>>
>>> Yes, that works: The system powers off after issuing
>>>      shutdown -h now
>>> from the dom0.
>>
>> So it is certainly an iommu interaction issue, which was sadly suspected
>> given that we have seen similar problems in the past.
>>
>> Curiously, there are two IOMMUs on the system.  I am not familiar enough
>> with Cougar Point chipsets to know how they are layed out.  Perhaps the
>> ACPI tables might have more information.
> I'm just curios, but where did you see two IOMMUs?

(XEN) PCI: Using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f
(XEN) Intel VT-d iommu 0 supported page sizes: 4kB.
(XEN) Intel VT-d iommu 1 supported page sizes: 4kB.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Snoop Control not enabled.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Dom0 DMA Passthrough not enabled.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Queued Invalidation enabled.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Interrupt Remapping enabled.
(XEN) Intel VT-d Shared EPT tables not enabled.
(XEN) I/O virtualisation enabled
(XEN)  - Dom0 mode: Relaxed

I added the iommu index into that loop because we found multi-socket
servers with multiple iommus, but I was not expecting to see two iommus
on a single socket workstation chipset.

>>
>> ACPI interaction with Xen is tricky at the best of times.  Xen as no AML
>> interpreter, so relies on Linux in dom0 to most of the ACPI legwork.
>>
>> My best guess at the moment is that something in the ACPI code for S5 is
>> turning off enough of the PCH that Xen can no longer talk to the one of
>> the IOMMUs.
>>
>> ~Andrew
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-14 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-14  8:48 Powerdown problem on XEN | ACPI S5 Atom2
2013-08-14 10:30 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-14 13:52   ` Atom2
2013-08-14 14:00     ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-14 17:00       ` Atom2
2013-08-14 17:30         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-14 18:40           ` Atom2
2013-08-14 19:10             ` Atom2
2013-08-14 19:18               ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-14 19:39                 ` Atom2
2013-08-14 20:18                   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-14 20:24                     ` Atom2
2013-08-14 20:30                       ` Atom2
2013-08-14 20:34                       ` Ben Guthro
2013-08-14 20:37                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-14 21:56                           ` Atom2
2013-08-15  1:58                             ` Ben Guthro
2013-08-15 19:28                               ` Atom2
2013-08-15 20:26                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-15 21:39                                   ` Atom2
2013-08-16 12:24                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-11 21:52                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-15 13:40                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-14 20:38                       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-14 20:54                         ` Atom2
2013-08-14 21:11                           ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-08-15  8:12                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-15  8:16                             ` Atom2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520BF26D.2080901@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ariel.atom2@web2web.at \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).