From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] xen/arm: initial cubieboard2 support. Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: <523340B4.8010506@linaro.org> References: <1379088118.19256.95.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1379088118.19256.95.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: keir@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jbuelich@suse.com, Josh Zhao List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/13/2013 05:01 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > See http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/297170 for some > information on how to get this going. > > I've rebased and addressed the review comments. > > As before several of the patches are not to be applied because they can > be done better using infrastructure from Julien's "Allow Xen to boot > with a raw Device Tree" patch. They are included for completeness. I have a branch on my git tree with my latest device tree patch series (git://xenbits.xen.org/people/julieng/xen-unstable.git dt-edition-v4). You can at least rework the patch #6 and #8. For the latter, as discussed previously, in a near future, a solution based on memory trapping should be the best solution to handle correctly non page-aligned device. > With this I can boot up until dom0 panics due to lack of a root > filesystem. This is because upstream Linux currently lacks any useful > storage drivers (SATA, USB host, MMC). Hopefully this will resolve > itself soon! > > Despite this I think those patches which aren't marked as being not for > application can be applied as soon as people are happy with them. Hence > I've dropped the RFC. > -- Julien Grall