From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/7] xen: arm: rewrite start of day page table and cpu bring up
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:55:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52388978.2080309@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379435765.11304.185.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk>
On 09/17/2013 05:36 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 17:18 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> + /* Now we can install the fixmap and dtb mappings, since we
>>> + * don't need the 1:1 map any more */
>>> + dsb sy
>>> + ldr r1, =boot_second
>>> +#if defined(EARLY_PRINTK)
>>> + /* xen_fixmap pagetable */
>>
>> Can you add a comment to explain why we don't need to map the fixmap
>> when early printk is not enabled?
>
> It's covered by the overall description of the boot tables layout which
> is in mm.c and referenced elsewhere in this file. Is the suficient?
I just saw the comment, I'm fine with it. It took me several minutes to
find where :).
> [..]
>>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h
>>> index f460e9c..f616807 100644
>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ struct platform_desc {
>>> /* Platform initialization */
>>> int (*init)(void);
>>> int (*init_time)(void);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
>>> + /* SMP */
>>> + int (*cpu_init)(int cpu);
>>
>> I don't think a cpu_init callback is usefull. An smp_init callback would
>> be better.
>>
>> This will allow you to move the sys_flags check for the versatile
>> express in smp_init.
>
> I wondered if there might be platforms with differeing mbox addresses
> for different CPU. e.g. the armv8 stuff (which doesn't use this path)
> makes provisions for this.
I believe, it's the case on midway. Andre, can you confirm?
But, I think this code can be merge in cpu_up.
>
> But I'll make the suggested change -- we can also refactor or add a
> second callback if such a platform shows up.
>
> You didn't trim your quotes, I hope I didn't miss any comments (I
> trimmed a bunch of the s/xen_/boot_/ ones... Will do a thorough
> sweep...)
You didn't miss any comments, next time I will trim my quotes.
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 1:37 [PATCH RFC 0/N] xen: arm: rework early bring up Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] xen: arm: Load xen under 4GB on 32-bit Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 15:44 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-19 9:21 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] xen: arm: Log the raw MIDR on boot Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 12:05 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-19 9:21 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] xen: arm: make sure we stay within the memory bank during mm setup Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 12:19 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-19 9:27 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] xen: arm: add two new device tree helpers Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 13:05 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 17:11 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 17:14 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] xen: arm: rewrite start of day page table and cpu bring up Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 16:18 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-17 16:36 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-17 16:55 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2013-09-17 18:30 ` Andre Przywara
2013-09-17 19:19 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 13:57 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 15:12 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 17:06 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 17:14 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-19 11:36 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-20 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-20 17:16 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-19 13:36 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] xen: arm: configure TCR_EL2 for 40 bit physical address space Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 15:50 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-19 13:42 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-17 1:40 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] xen: arm: split cpu0's domheap mapping PTs out from xen_second Ian Campbell
2013-09-19 13:47 ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-17 11:34 ` [PATCH RFC 0/N] xen: arm: rework early bring up Julien Grall
2013-09-17 12:43 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 13:40 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 17:33 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 19:22 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 19:24 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 20:00 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 20:22 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-18 21:14 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-18 21:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-09-19 14:49 ` Julien Grall
2013-09-19 15:51 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52388978.2080309@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).