From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v12 06/21] pvh: Introduce PVH guest type
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523C1CE0.2090803@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5239D08102000078000F4675@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 18/09/13 15:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.09.13 at 18:25, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> Introduce new PVH guest type, flags to create it, and ways to identify it.
>>
>> To begin with, it will inherit functionality marked hvm_container.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> with one minor comment:
>
>> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
>> @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ void getdomaininfo(struct domain *d, struct
>> xen_domctl_getdomaininfo *info)
>>
>> if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
>> info->flags |= XEN_DOMINF_hvm_guest;
>> + else if ( is_pvh_domain(d) )
>> + info->flags |= XEN_DOMINF_pvh_guest;
> I'd prefer constructs like this to be done as a switch statement.
Hmm, the resulting boilerplate takes up 11 lines rather than 4, but I
guess that's OK with me...
Thanks,
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-20 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 16:25 Introduce PVH domU support George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 01/21] Fix failure path in hvm_vcpu_initialise George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 02/21] Fix failure path in construct_vmcs George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 03/21] Remove an unnecessary assert from vmx_update_debug_state George Dunlap
2013-09-16 21:09 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-09-18 10:39 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-18 12:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-18 12:53 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-18 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 04/21] pvh prep: code motion George Dunlap
2013-09-18 12:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 05/21] Introduce pv guest type and has_hvm_container macros George Dunlap
2013-09-18 13:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-19 16:27 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 9:23 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 9:44 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-19 16:58 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 06/21] pvh: Introduce PVH guest type George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 10:01 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 07/21] pvh: Disable unneeded features of HVM containers George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:36 ` George Dunlap
[not found] ` <CAGU+aus16muryVYd-aOzv-CAXPk_xxVh_e-R7Ug1RxGRJ_MAfQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-13 21:33 ` Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)
2013-09-16 23:17 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-09-18 10:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:18 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-18 14:43 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 08/21] pvh: vmx-specific changes George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:38 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-16 7:37 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-16 9:15 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-16 23:12 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-09-17 8:48 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-18 0:13 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-09-18 14:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 13:07 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 09/21] pvh: Do not allow PVH guests to change paging modes George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:32 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 10/21] pvh: PVH access to hypercalls George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 11/21] pvh: Use PV e820 George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 12/21] pvh: Support guest_kernel_mode for PVH George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 13/21] pvh: Support read_segment_register " George Dunlap
2013-09-18 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 14:18 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 14/21] pvh: read_descriptor for PVH guests George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:40 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-18 15:00 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 15/21] pvh: Set up more PV stuff in set_info_guest George Dunlap
2013-09-18 15:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 14:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 14:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 15:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 15:26 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 16/21] pvh: Use PV handlers for emulated forced invalid ops, cpuid, and IO George Dunlap
2013-09-18 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-19 1:02 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-09-19 10:09 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-20 17:03 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-20 17:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-23 6:49 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-23 13:48 ` George Dunlap
2013-09-23 14:09 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 17/21] pvh: Disable 32-bit guest support for now George Dunlap
2013-09-18 15:36 ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 18/21] pvh: Restrict tsc_mode to NEVER_EMULATE " George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 19/21] pvh: Disable debug traps when doing pv emulation for PVH domains George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 20/21] pvh: Disable memevents for PVH guests for now George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:25 ` [PATCH RFC v12 21/21] pvh: Documentation George Dunlap
2013-09-13 16:41 ` Introduce PVH domU support George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523C1CE0.2090803@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).