From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Fantoni Subject: Re: qemu update? Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:16:28 +0200 Message-ID: <52429BDC.7060204@m2r.biz> References: <1379938756-8634-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <5242A6B602000078000F6130@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VOkGp-0006UT-US for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:16:28 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t61so5621722wes.2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:16:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5242A6B602000078000F6130@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: anthony.perard@citrix.com, xen-devel , ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Il 25/09/2013 09:02, Jan Beulich ha scritto: >>>> On 23.09.13 at 14:19, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell > Speaking of which - an up-rev of our qemu-upstream tree is likely > on order then too? I think it is very important to us to keep qemu updated at latest stable version (1.6). I'm keeping tested qemu latest versions and the only critical regression was fixed with the path below: http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=04d7bad8a4fb23e6d9af9d06ce3ddc28a251d94d About the other critical problem regarding vga, it was fixed on xen 4.3. No other regression found here but again I think it is always good practice to keep updated qemu on xen-unstable and testing it frequently. > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel