xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct.
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:13:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5242E184.9080303@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380113870-3641-3-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>

On 25/09/13 13:57, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> We do the microcode code update in two steps - the presmp:
>  'microcode_presmp_init' and when CPUs are brought up:
> 'microcode_init'. The earlier performs the microcode update
> on the BSP - but unfortunately it does not check whether the
> update failed. Which means that we might try later to update
> a incorrect payload on the rest of CPUs.
>
> This patch handles this odd situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>

While not strictly relevant to this patch, I simply noticed when
reviewing it that ucode_blob is __initdata.  Given the comment "The
cached microcode patch is applied when CPUs resume from a sleep state."
in the previous patch, what is the policy for reloading microcode after
deep sleep / cpu hotplug ?

> [v2: Redid it as we are not doing scan and <index> at the same time]
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/microcode.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
> index 8136d44..0bc95e6 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,7 @@ static int __init microcode_presmp_init(void)
>          {
>              void *data;
>              size_t len;
> +            int rc = 0;
>  
>              if ( ucode_blob.size )
>              {
> @@ -431,10 +432,23 @@ static int __init microcode_presmp_init(void)
>                  data = ucode_mod_map(&ucode_mod);
>              }
>              if ( data )
> -                microcode_update_cpu(data, len);
> +                rc = microcode_update_cpu(data, len);
> +            else
> +                rc = -ENOMEM;
>  
>              if ( !ucode_blob.size )
>                  ucode_mod_map(NULL);
> +
> +            if ( rc )
> +            {
> +                if ( ucode_blob.size )
> +                {
> +                    xfree(ucode_blob.data);
> +                    ucode_blob.size = 0;
> +                    ucode_blob.data = NULL;
> +                } else
> +                    ucode_mod.mod_end = 0;
> +            }
>          }
>  
>          register_cpu_notifier(&microcode_percpu_nfb);

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-25 12:57 [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] microcode: Scan the initramfs payload for microcode blob Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 13:09   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-25 14:11     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 14:51       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-25 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 13:13   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-09-25 13:59     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 14:10       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-25 19:36 ` [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2013-09-25 20:03   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 22:39     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2013-09-26 11:30       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-25 15:29 [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3.2) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 15:39   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-25 15:57     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-27  1:09 [PATCH] microcode: Scan the multiboot payloads for cpio format microcode blob. (v3.3) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-27  1:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] microcode: Check whether the microcode is correct Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5242E184.9080303@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).