Re: [PATCH] hvmloader/smbios: Change strncpy to memcpy for anchor strings.

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>]

On 24/09/13 11:11, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 24/09/2013 10:39, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
>>>> -    strncpy(ep->anchor_string, "_SM_", 4);
>>>> +    memcpy(ep->anchor_string, "_SM_", sizeof(ep->anchor_string));
>>> Why the change from 4 to sizeof(ep->anchor_string) here (and similar below)?
>>> Setting the copy length based on the size of the destination rather than the
>>> source seems like the wrong thing to do.
>> One can argue either way here:
>> - passing the destination's size guarantees no memory corruption
>> - passing the source's size guarantees no uninitialized memory
>>
>> Since the structure fields involved here aren't going to change,
>> either way is fine imo.
> As was the unadorned number 4, imo.
>
>  -- Keir
>
>

So what is the verdict here?  I changed 4 to sizeof to match the
prevailing style of other anchor strings in hvmloader.

I can resubmit and change back to hard coded numbers if that would cause
the patch to be accepted.

~Andrew