From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: preparing for 4.3.1
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:45:08 +0100
Message-ID: <524561B4.20705@citrix.com>
References: <524574FC02000078000F76A2@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<52455F7C.8030900@citrix.com>
	<1380278501.29483.182.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>) id 1VPVjv-0003Bb-M8
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:57:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1380278501.29483.182.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 27/09/13 11:41, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 11:35 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 27/09/13 11:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Aiming at a release later in October (before Xen Summit I would
>>> hope), I'd like to cut RC1 next week.
>>>
>>> Please indicate any bug fixes that so far may have been missed
>>> in the backports already done.
>>>
>>> Jan
>> In terms of bugs, it would be very nice for my migration stream
>> regression fix to get in, although I suspect that the answer will be
>> "its too close to the cutoff and still not in unstable yet".  FWIW,
>> given the lack of support for remus in libxl in 4.3, the backport is
>> substantially smaller than what needs to go into unstable.  I guess this
>> call goes to either of the Ian's
> Has the backported version been posted somewhere? It's not got very much
> to do with the mainline patch IIRC.
>
>

If the unstable patch gets accepted (even if only in principle), I will
happily construct the backport for 4.3.  It will basically contain the
Xend and libxc bits, with the libxl callsights hardcoded with a constant.

~Andrew