From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] xen/events: refactor retrigger_dynirq() and resend_irq_on_evtchn() Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 22:01:13 +0100 Message-ID: <524C8999.5020508@cantab.net> References: <1380734101-2991-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <1380734101-2991-2-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <20131002204335.GA25399@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131002204335.GA25399@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , David Vrabel , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/10/2013 21:43, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:14:46PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >> From: David Vrabel >> >> These two function did the same thing with different parameters, put >> the common bits in retrigger_evtchn(). >> >> This changes the return value of resend_irq_on_evtchn() but the only >> caller (in arch/ia64/xen/irq_xen.c) ignored the return value so this >> is fine. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel > > Hm, I thought I acked it? You said "Looks good to me" which wasn't official enough to add as a tag. David