From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] per_cpu() fixes Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:55:25 +0100 Message-ID: <524DAF8D.7050003@citrix.com> References: <1380188966-26665-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1380188966-26665-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , Xen-devel , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/09/13 10:49, Andrew Cooper wrote: > This patch series is two independent but related changes to the use of > per_cpu() with offline pcpus. > > The first patch is a fix for use of get_cpu_idle_time() whereby toolstack > hypercalls could cause an effective NULL structure dereference. > > The second patch is a forward looking fix to try and prevent similar issues in > the future. It causes uses of per_cpu() against an offline pcpu to cause a > #GF rather than to try and dereference a very low address. > > The third patch is debugging code to demonstrate the effects of patch 2. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper > CC: Keir Fraser > CC: Jan Beulich > CC: Tim Deegan > CC: Ian Campbell > CC: Ian Jackson > Ping? Any thoughts at all? ~Andrew