From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: XSA-60 solutions Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:08:25 +0100 Message-ID: <5252CE69.90005@citrix.com> References: <5252E9B002000078000F94E6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5252E9B002000078000F94E6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Jinsong Liu , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Will Auld , Jun Nakajima , "sherry.hurwitz@amd.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/10/13 16:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 07.10.13 at 16:29, "Liu, Jinsong" wrote: >> Any comments/suggestions? > As pointed out in earlier private conversation, I think that the dual > table approach would be preferable if it can be made work. > > I'm surprised no-one from Oracle responded so far, as it was them > originally having found the issue. > > Jan > > I cant remember whether I asked this before or not, but is there a reason why this cant be done in the same way as hypercall continuations? ~Andrew