From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] xen/arm: Implement hypercall for dirty page tracing Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:10:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5256B561.5070000@linaro.org> References: <1380861845-23268-1-git-send-email-jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com> <1380861845-23268-9-git-send-email-jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com> <5252B0EC.4010809@citrix.com> <5252D87A.2050305@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5252D87A.2050305@samsung.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Eugene Fedotov Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/07/2013 04:51 PM, Eugene Fedotov wrote: > Let me explain. I think the difference between handle_page_fault and > handle_mmio is that the ongoing memory operation (that trapped here) > should be repeated after handle_page_fault (the page fault handler > clears read-only bit), but should be stepped out after handle_mmio (to > do this we call advance_pc to increase the pc register). So, advance_pc > is intentionally missed. Oh right, thanks for the explanation! -- Julien Grall