From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: check for canonical address before doing page walks
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:17:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5256B704.1010206@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5256D16902000078000FA46C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 10/10/13 15:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 10.10.13 at 16:01, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 10/10/13 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c
>>> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ void show_page_walk(unsigned long addr)
>>> l1_pgentry_t l1e, *l1t;
>>>
>>> printk("Pagetable walk from %016lx:\n", addr);
>>> + if ( !is_canonical_address(addr) )
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> l4t = map_domain_page(mfn);
>>> l4e = l4t[l4_table_offset(addr)];
>>>
>> I was intending something a little more like
>>
>> if ( !is_canonical_address(addr) )
>> {
>> printk(" Not canonical\n");
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> So it doesn't appear on the console that show_page_walk() got stuck
>> somewhere.
> Seems pretty pointless - the address is being printed, and anyone
> (I would hope) can easily see whether it is non-canonical.
>
> Jan
>
True I suppose, although it would start getting harder if/when the
non-canonical section shrinks in size.
I would prefer the printk(), but am not overly fussed and the other fix
is certainly good, so
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 13:49 [PATCH 0/4] x86: XSA-67 follow-up Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: correct LDT checks Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 13:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: add address validity check to guest_map_l1e() Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 13:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-10 13:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: use {rd, wr}{fs, gs}base when available Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-10 13:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: check for canonical address before doing page walks Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 14:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-10 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-10 14:17 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-10-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86: XSA-67 follow-up Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5256B704.1010206@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).