From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 0/9] Xen: extend kexec hypercall for use with pv-ops kernels Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:06:09 +0100 Message-ID: <525805D1.3040900@citrix.com> References: <1381251310-29449-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <20131009152616.GB30387@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> <52557E4A.2000500@citrix.com> <20131010154538.GA22446@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> <5256D75B.5090504@citrix.com> <20131010212433.GX3626@debian70-amd64.local.net-space.pl> <5257BB9102000078000FA6F2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5257CB49.4030005@citrix.com> <20131011111521.GB3626@debian70-amd64.local.net-space.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131011111521.GB3626@debian70-amd64.local.net-space.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Daniel Kiper Cc: Keir Fraser , Daniel Kiper , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11/10/13 12:15, Daniel Kiper wrote: > >> + * - Register values are undefined. > > If Linux and kexec guys state that they do not care then I do not care too. > Let's wait what will happen in "kexec: Clearing registers just before > jumping into purgatory" thread. How about we get the current series in as-is (plus the extra docs) and then, since you feel so strongly about this minor point, you post a follow patch to change the behaviour? Does that work for you? If so and if you're happy with everything else, can I get your Reviewed-by on the whole series? David