From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] Linux: FIFO-based event channel ABI Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:36:03 +0100 Message-ID: <525EB263.9010407@citrix.com> References: <1381236555-27493-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <525BF4A4.1030100@citrix.com> <1381936762.29312.2.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1381936762.29312.2.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/10/13 16:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 14:41 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 08/10/13 13:48, David Vrabel wrote: >>> This is the complete Linux guest-side implementation of the FIFO-based >>> event channel ABI described in this design document: >>> >>> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/dvrabel/event-channels-F.pdf >>> >>> Refer also to the Xen series. >> >> The Xen series has now been merged. > > Congrats. We should probably arrange for some sort of baseline level off > osstest support for this, which I suppose means a test job using some > new enough kernel > > Long term I suppose this means adding a newer upstream kernel to the > flights (e.g. the next long term supported one?) but short term should > we be testing something? Do we test a linux-next tree of any sort? Features like this could be tested by adding support to minios. Someone other than me would have to do this work though. David