From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix locking in cpu_disable_scheduler()
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:30:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F9C4B.8010107@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526E994E02000078000FD571@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 10/28/2013 04:05 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> So commit eedd6039 ("scheduler: adjust internal locking interface")
> uncovered - by now using proper spin lock constructs - a bug after all:
> When bringing down a CPU, cpu_disable_scheduler() gets called with
> interrupts disabled, and hence the use of vcpu_schedule_lock_irq() was
> never really correct (i.e. the caller ended up with interrupts enabled
> despite having disabled them explicitly).
>
> Fixing this however surfaced another problem: The call path
> vcpu_migrate() -> evtchn_move_pirqs() wants to acquire the event lock,
> which however is a non-IRQ-safe once, and hence check_lock() doesn't
> like this lock to be acquired when interrupts are already off. As we're
> in stop-machine context here, getting things wrong wrt interrupt state
> management during lock acquire/release is out of question though, so
> the simple solution to this appears to be to just suppress spin lock
> debugging for the period of time while the stop machine callback gets
> run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-28 16:05 [PATCH] fix locking in cpu_disable_scheduler() Jan Beulich
2013-10-28 15:24 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-28 16:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-29 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-29 11:30 ` George Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526F9C4B.8010107@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).