From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Li Yechen <lccycc123@gmail.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 01/12] xen: numa-sched: leave node-affinity alone if not in "auto" mode
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:43:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52790401.3050007@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105143411.30446.78865.stgit@Solace>
On 11/05/2013 02:34 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> If the domain's NUMA node-affinity is being specified by the
> user/toolstack (instead of being automatically computed by Xen),
> we really should stick to that. This means domain_update_node_affinity()
> is wrong when it filters out some stuff from there even in "!auto"
> mode.
>
> This commit fixes that. Of course, this does not mean node-affinity
> is always honoured (e.g., a vcpu won't run on a pcpu of a different
> cpupool) but the necessary logic for taking into account all the
> possible situations lives in the scheduler code, where it belongs.
>
> What could happen without this change is that, under certain
> circumstances, the node-affinity of a domain may change when the
> user modifies the vcpu-affinity of the domain's vcpus. This, even
> if probably not a real bug, is at least something the user does
> not expect, so let's avoid it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
> This has been submitted already as a single patch on its own.
> Since this series needs the change done here, just include it
> in here, instead of pinging the original submission and deferring
> posting this series.
Just reiterating what I said on the last send... this one is independent
and can be checked in whenever you're ready.
-George
> ---
> xen/common/domain.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/domain.c b/xen/common/domain.c
> index 5999779..af31ab4 100644
> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ void domain_update_node_affinity(struct domain *d)
> cpumask_var_t cpumask;
> cpumask_var_t online_affinity;
> const cpumask_t *online;
> - nodemask_t nodemask = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> struct vcpu *v;
> unsigned int node;
>
> @@ -374,28 +373,19 @@ void domain_update_node_affinity(struct domain *d)
> cpumask_or(cpumask, cpumask, online_affinity);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If d->auto_node_affinity is true, the domain's node-affinity mask
> + * (d->node_affinity) is automaically computed from all the domain's
> + * vcpus' vcpu-affinity masks (the union of which we have just built
> + * above in cpumask). OTOH, if d->auto_node_affinity is false, we
> + * must leave the node-affinity of the domain alone.
> + */
> if ( d->auto_node_affinity )
> {
> - /* Node-affinity is automaically computed from all vcpu-affinities */
> + nodes_clear(d->node_affinity);
> for_each_online_node ( node )
> if ( cpumask_intersects(&node_to_cpumask(node), cpumask) )
> - node_set(node, nodemask);
> -
> - d->node_affinity = nodemask;
> - }
> - else
> - {
> - /* Node-affinity is provided by someone else, just filter out cpus
> - * that are either offline or not in the affinity of any vcpus. */
> - nodemask = d->node_affinity;
> - for_each_node_mask ( node, d->node_affinity )
> - if ( !cpumask_intersects(&node_to_cpumask(node), cpumask) )
> - node_clear(node, nodemask);//d->node_affinity);
> -
> - /* Avoid loosing track of node-affinity because of a bad
> - * vcpu-affinity has been specified. */
> - if ( !nodes_empty(nodemask) )
> - d->node_affinity = nodemask;
> + node_set(node, d->node_affinity);
> }
>
> sched_set_node_affinity(d, &d->node_affinity);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 14:33 [PATCH RESEND 00/12] Implement per-vcpu NUMA node-affinity for credit1 Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:34 ` [PATCH RESEND 01/12] xen: numa-sched: leave node-affinity alone if not in "auto" mode Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:43 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-11-05 14:34 ` [PATCH RESEND 02/12] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-06 8:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-07 18:17 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-08 9:24 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-08 15:20 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-05 14:34 ` [PATCH RESEND 03/12] xl: implement and enable dryrun mode for `xl vcpu-pin' Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:34 ` [PATCH RESEND 04/12] xl: test script for the cpumap parser (for vCPU pinning) Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 05/12] xen: numa-sched: make space for per-vcpu node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-05 15:03 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-05 15:24 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 22:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 15:11 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 15:23 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-05 15:39 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 16:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 17:16 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 17:30 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-05 23:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 23:01 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 9:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-06 10:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 11:44 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-06 14:26 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 14:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-06 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-06 16:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-06 16:22 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-06 16:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 16:20 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 16:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 17:24 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-05 17:31 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-05 23:08 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 22:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 22:22 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 11:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-06 14:47 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-06 16:53 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 06/12] xen: numa-sched: domain node-affinity always comes from vcpu node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 07/12] xen: numa-sched: use per-vcpu node-affinity for actual scheduling Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 16:20 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-06 9:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 08/12] xen: numa-sched: enable getting/specifying per-vcpu node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 09/12] libxc: " Dario Faggioli
2013-11-07 18:27 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-12 16:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-12 16:43 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-12 16:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-12 18:40 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-12 19:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-12 21:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 10:57 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-05 14:35 ` [PATCH RESEND 10/12] libxl: " Dario Faggioli
2013-11-07 18:29 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-08 9:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-08 15:07 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 11/12] xl: " Dario Faggioli
2013-11-07 18:33 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-08 9:33 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-08 15:18 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 12/12] xl: numa-sched: enable specifying node-affinity in VM config file Dario Faggioli
2013-11-07 18:35 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-08 9:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-08 15:22 ` Ian Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-12 8:11 Fwd: [PATCH RESEND 01/12] xen: numa-sched: leave node-affinity alone if not in "auto" mode Jan Beulich
2013-11-12 8:35 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52790401.3050007@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=jtweaver@hawaii.edu \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=lccycc123@gmail.com \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=ufimtseva@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).