From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:24:12 +0000 Message-ID: <527929BC.6060201@eu.citrix.com> References: <20130916183518.20003.61823.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <1379357269.6095.170.camel@Solace> <1380106994.8005.51.camel@Solace> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1380106994.8005.51.camel@Solace> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/25/2013 12:03 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On lun, 2013-09-16 at 20:47 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> On lun, 2013-09-16 at 20:40 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Take 3 of this series. It allows for specifying vcpu pinning taking NUMA nodes >>> into account. IOW, something like this: >>> >>> * "nodes:0-3": all pCPUs of nodes 0,1,2,3; >>> * "nodes:0-3,^node:2": all pCPUS of nodes 0,1,3; >>> * "1,nodes:1-2,^6": pCPU 1 plus all pCPUs of nodes 1,2 >>> but not pCPU 6; >>> >>> All comments that v2 got have been addressed. In particular, the test script >>> has been rearranged and enhanced to match the requested behavior (generate a >>> test vector file and then read it). >>> >> And of course I forgot to put a "v3" tag in the subject line. >> > Ping? > > I know IanJ is away, but perhaps I at least can get the Ack-s or the > comments from the others (well, from IanC, I suppose :-) ). Dario, All of these were folded into the series you just re-sent, right? I can delete these from my queue of things to look at? :-) (Yes, it's been there this whole time...) -George