From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 04/17] Introduce pv guest type and has_hvm_container macros Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:11:50 +0000 Message-ID: <527B7576.3070007@eu.citrix.com> References: <1383567306-6636-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> <1383567306-6636-5-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> <5277D75E02000078000FF305@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <527B71BF.2090809@eu.citrix.com> <527B81BE02000078001008C9@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNVa-0004H1-Hg for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:12:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: <527B81BE02000078001008C9@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/11/13 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 07.11.13 at 11:55, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 04/11/13 16:20, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 04.11.13 at 13:14, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> hvm_container is more of a fuzzy concept, but in general: >>> So sadly this is still being retained, despite its redundancy. >> Given that the long-term plan is to get rid of the extra mode entirely >> (at which point has_hvm_container will also go away), are you OK with >> this patchset going in as it is? > Yes, I am. I solely expressed that I'm not particularly happy with it. OK -- just wanting to make sure this wouldn't be interpreted as a "Nack". :-) -George