From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/14] xen: arm: define guest virtual platform in API headers
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:29:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527C92CA.6050408@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383842696-8598-8-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
On 11/07/2013 08:44 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The tools and the hypervisor need to agree on various aspects of the guest
> environment, such as interrupt numbers, memory layout, initial register values
> for registers which are implementation defined etc. Therefore move the
> associated defines into the public interface headers, or create them as
> necessary. However these should not be exposed to guests, they should find
> these things out via device tree or should not be relying on implementation
> defined defaults.
>
> Various bits of the hypervisor needed to change to configure dom0 with the real
> platform values while using the virtual platform configuration for guests.
> Arrange for this where appropriate and plumb through as needed.
>
> We also need to expose some 64-bit values (e.g. PSR_GUEST64_INIT) for the
> benefit of 32 bit toolstacks building 64 bit guests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> ---
> tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c | 4 +--
> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 8 ++++--
> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 13 +++++----
> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 21 +++++++++-----
> xen/arch/arm/psci.c | 2 +-
> xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 2 +-
> xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c | 13 ++++++---
> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 +
> xen/include/asm-arm/event.h | 3 +-
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 3 --
> xen/include/asm-arm/processor.h | 7 -----
> xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h | 5 ----
> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 13 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
[..]
> /* HCR Hyp Configuration Register */
> #define HCR_RW (1<<31) /* Register Width, ARM64 only */
> #define HCR_TGE (1<<27) /* Trap General Exceptions */
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
> index fdba636..67d4c35 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
> @@ -6,11 +6,6 @@
> #define PSCI_EINVAL -2
> #define PSCI_DENIED -3
>
> -#define __PSCI_cpu_suspend 0
> -#define __PSCI_cpu_off 1
> -#define __PSCI_cpu_on 2
> -#define __PSCI_migrate 3
> -
> int do_psci_cpu_on(uint32_t vcpuid, register_t entry_point);
> int do_psci_cpu_off(uint32_t power_state);
> int do_psci_cpu_suspend(uint32_t power_state, register_t entry_point);
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
> index 5d359af..70a0766 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
> @@ -268,8 +268,21 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t;
>
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__)
> +
> /* PSR bits (CPSR, SPSR)*/
>
> +#define PSR_THUMB (1<<5) /* Thumb Mode enable */
> +#define PSR_FIQ_MASK (1<<6) /* Fast Interrupt mask */
> +#define PSR_IRQ_MASK (1<<7) /* Interrupt mask */
> +#define PSR_ABT_MASK (1<<8) /* Asynchronous Abort mask */
> +#define PSR_BIG_ENDIAN (1<<9) /* Big Endian Mode */
> +#ifdef __aarch64__ /* For Aarch64 bit 9 is repurposed. */
If you keep __aarch64__, you won't be able to have dom0 in 32 bits on arm64.
BTW, what does prevent the developer to use arm64 defines on arm64?
> +#define PSR_DBG_MASK (1<<9)
> +#endif
> +#define PSR_IT_MASK (0x0600fc00) /* Thumb If-Then Mask */
> +#define PSR_JAZELLE (1<<24) /* Jazelle Mode */
> +
> /* 32 bit modes */
> #define PSR_MODE_USR 0x10
> #define PSR_MODE_FIQ 0x11
> @@ -281,8 +294,6 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t;
> #define PSR_MODE_UND 0x1b
> #define PSR_MODE_SYS 0x1f
>
> -/* 64 bit modes */
I would keep this commit. It's good to know that it's ARM64 specific.
> -#ifdef __aarch64__
> #define PSR_MODE_BIT 0x10 /* Set iff AArch32 */
> #define PSR_MODE_EL3h 0x0d
> #define PSR_MODE_EL3t 0x0c
> @@ -291,18 +302,43 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t;
> #define PSR_MODE_EL1h 0x05
> #define PSR_MODE_EL1t 0x04
> #define PSR_MODE_EL0t 0x00
> -#endif
>
> -#define PSR_THUMB (1<<5) /* Thumb Mode enable */
> -#define PSR_FIQ_MASK (1<<6) /* Fast Interrupt mask */
> -#define PSR_IRQ_MASK (1<<7) /* Interrupt mask */
> -#define PSR_ABT_MASK (1<<8) /* Asynchronous Abort mask */
> -#define PSR_BIG_ENDIAN (1<<9) /* Big Endian Mode */
> -#ifdef __aarch64__ /* For Aarch64 bit 9 is repurposed. */
> -#define PSR_DBG_MASK (1<<9)
> +#define PSR_GUEST64_INIT (PSR_ABT_MASK|PSR_FIQ_MASK|PSR_IRQ_MASK|PSR_MODE_EL1h)
> +
> +#define SCTLR_GUEST_INIT 0x00c50078
> +
> +/*
> + * Virtual machine platform (memory layout, interrupts)
> + *
> + * These are defined for consistency between the tools and the
> + * hypervisor. Guests must not rely on these hardcoded values but
> + * should instead use the FDT.
> + */
> +
I don't like the solution to hardcode GIC, IRQs (timer + evtchn) in the
public interface. If we keep this solution, we will need to modify,
again, the ABI for ARM, why can't we add/extend some hypercalls to give
theses values to the hypervisor?
> +/* Physical Address Space */
> +#define GUEST_GICD_BASE 0x2c001000ULL
> +#define GUEST_GICD_SIZE 0x1000ULL
> +#define GUEST_GICC_BASE 0x2c002000ULL
> +#define GUEST_GICC_SIZE 0x100ULL
> +
> +#define GUEST_RAM_BASE 0x80000000ULL
This define should be libxc/libxl specific. Xen should not use this value.
> +
> +#define GUEST_GNTTAB_BASE 0xb0000000ULL
> +#define GUEST_GNTTAB_SIZE 0x00020000ULL
> +
> +/* Interrupts */
> +#define GUEST_TIMER_VIRT_PPI 27
> +#define GUEST_TIMER_PHYS_S_PPI 29
> +#define GUEST_TIMER_PHYS_NS_PPI 30
> +#define GUEST_EVTCHN_PPI 31
> +
> +/* PSCI functions */
> +#define PSCI_cpu_suspend 0
> +#define PSCI_cpu_off 1
> +#define PSCI_cpu_on 2
> +#define PSCI_migrate 3
> +
> #endif
> -#define PSR_IT_MASK (0x0600fc00) /* Thumb If-Then Mask */
> -#define PSR_JAZELLE (1<<24) /* Jazelle Mode */
>
> #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_ARCH_ARM_H__ */
>
>
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-08 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 16:44 [PATCH v3 00/14] xen: arm: 64-bit guest support and domU FDT autogeneration Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] xen: arm: Report aarch64 capability Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] xen: arm: Add comment regard arm64 zImage v0 vs v1 Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] xen: arm: allocate dom0 memory separately from preparing the dtb Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 7:18 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-08 9:36 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 12:08 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-11 12:12 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 12:25 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-11 13:17 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] xen: arm: add enable-method to cpu nodes for arm64 guests Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] xen: arm: implement XEN_DOMCTL_set_address_size Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 12:13 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] xen: arm: implement arch_set_info_guest for 64-bit vcpus Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 7:20 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] tools: check for libfdt when building for ARM Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:04 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] xen: arm: define guest virtual platform in API headers Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 7:29 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2013-11-08 9:48 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 14:25 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-11 15:12 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] libxc: arm: rename various bits of zimage load with 32 suffix Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] libxc: allow caller to specify guest rambase rather than hardcoding Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:06 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:30 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] libxc: allow passing a device tree blob to the guest Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:09 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:10 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:31 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:42 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 10:46 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] libxc: support for arm64 Image format Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 14:28 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] libxc: arm64 vcpu initialisation Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:09 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-11 15:03 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] libxl: build a device tree for ARM guests Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:30 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:41 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:47 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-08 9:30 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 15:14 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-11 12:14 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 10:51 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527C92CA.6050408@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).