From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/14] xen: arm: define guest virtual platform in API headers
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:25:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5280E8DA.1080506@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383904100.3189.52.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
On 11/08/2013 09:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 23:29 -0800, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>>> +#define PSR_THUMB (1<<5) /* Thumb Mode enable */
>>> +#define PSR_FIQ_MASK (1<<6) /* Fast Interrupt mask */
>>> +#define PSR_IRQ_MASK (1<<7) /* Interrupt mask */
>>> +#define PSR_ABT_MASK (1<<8) /* Asynchronous Abort mask */
>>> +#define PSR_BIG_ENDIAN (1<<9) /* Big Endian Mode */
>>> +#ifdef __aarch64__ /* For Aarch64 bit 9 is repurposed. */
>>
>> If you keep __aarch64__, you won't be able to have dom0 in 32 bits on arm64.
>
> Oops. I removed the others but missed this one. Nothing about this
> particular #if would prevent you having a 32 bit dom0 on arm64.
>
> But I'll remove the #define and add a comment anyway.
>
>> BTW, what does prevent the developer to use arm64 defines on arm64?
>
> Did you mean s/64/32/ in one of those? The answer is nothing other than
> code review, getting bug reports etc. I don't think there is any way we
> can prevent it programmatically. Maybe separate enums for 32 vs 64-bit
> PSR values, but I think that would get nasty fast.
What about defining arm64 specific stuff only if we are in xen tools or
in xen and build for arm64?
ie:
XEN_TOOLS || (XEN && ARM64)
>>
>>> +#define PSR_DBG_MASK (1<<9)
>>> +#endif
>>> +#define PSR_IT_MASK (0x0600fc00) /* Thumb If-Then Mask */
>>> +#define PSR_JAZELLE (1<<24) /* Jazelle Mode */
>>> +
>>> /* 32 bit modes */
>>> #define PSR_MODE_USR 0x10
>>> #define PSR_MODE_FIQ 0x11
>>> @@ -281,8 +294,6 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t;
>>> #define PSR_MODE_UND 0x1b
>>> #define PSR_MODE_SYS 0x1f
>>>
>>> -/* 64 bit modes */
>>
>> I would keep this commit. It's good to know that it's ARM64 specific.
>
> Yes.
>
>>
>>> -#ifdef __aarch64__
>>> #define PSR_MODE_BIT 0x10 /* Set iff AArch32 */
>>> #define PSR_MODE_EL3h 0x0d
>>> #define PSR_MODE_EL3t 0x0c
>>> @@ -291,18 +302,43 @@ typedef uint64_t xen_callback_t;
>>> #define PSR_MODE_EL1h 0x05
>>> #define PSR_MODE_EL1t 0x04
>>> #define PSR_MODE_EL0t 0x00
>>> -#endif
>>>
>>> -#define PSR_THUMB (1<<5) /* Thumb Mode enable */
>>> -#define PSR_FIQ_MASK (1<<6) /* Fast Interrupt mask */
>>> -#define PSR_IRQ_MASK (1<<7) /* Interrupt mask */
>>> -#define PSR_ABT_MASK (1<<8) /* Asynchronous Abort mask */
>>> -#define PSR_BIG_ENDIAN (1<<9) /* Big Endian Mode */
>>> -#ifdef __aarch64__ /* For Aarch64 bit 9 is repurposed. */
>>> -#define PSR_DBG_MASK (1<<9)
>>> +#define PSR_GUEST64_INIT (PSR_ABT_MASK|PSR_FIQ_MASK|PSR_IRQ_MASK|PSR_MODE_EL1h)
>>> +
>>> +#define SCTLR_GUEST_INIT 0x00c50078
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Virtual machine platform (memory layout, interrupts)
>>> + *
>>> + * These are defined for consistency between the tools and the
>>> + * hypervisor. Guests must not rely on these hardcoded values but
>>> + * should instead use the FDT.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>
>> I don't like the solution to hardcode GIC, IRQs (timer + evtchn) in the
>> public interface.
>
> Note that this is inside
> #if defined(__XEN__) || defined(__XEN_TOOLS__)
> so it is not exposed to guests and therefore not part of the guest ABI.
> The tools ABI is completely fungible and we can change it at will.
>
>> If we keep this solution, we will need to modify,
>> again, the ABI for ARM, why can't we add/extend some hypercalls to give
>> theses values to the hypervisor?
>
> That would be overkill until (if!) we get to the point of needing a more
> dynamic guest layout.
The current solution has some memory limitations. The layout doesn't
allow to allocate more than 768MB (space between the GUEST_RAM_BASE and
GUEST_GNTTAB_BASE).
>
> I'm not going to implement that now. I thought I'd expressed this in the
> commit message or the cover letter but it seems I forgot. I'll add some
> words to the commit message for the next posting.
Ok. Can you document somewhere the guest memory layout?
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 16:44 [PATCH v3 00/14] xen: arm: 64-bit guest support and domU FDT autogeneration Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] xen: arm: Report aarch64 capability Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] xen: arm: Add comment regard arm64 zImage v0 vs v1 Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] xen: arm: allocate dom0 memory separately from preparing the dtb Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 7:18 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-08 9:36 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 12:08 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-11 12:12 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 12:25 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-11 13:17 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] xen: arm: add enable-method to cpu nodes for arm64 guests Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] xen: arm: implement XEN_DOMCTL_set_address_size Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 12:13 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] xen: arm: implement arch_set_info_guest for 64-bit vcpus Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 7:20 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] tools: check for libfdt when building for ARM Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:04 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] xen: arm: define guest virtual platform in API headers Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 7:29 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-08 9:48 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 14:25 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2013-11-11 15:12 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] libxc: arm: rename various bits of zimage load with 32 suffix Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] libxc: allow caller to specify guest rambase rather than hardcoding Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:06 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:30 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] libxc: allow passing a device tree blob to the guest Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:09 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:10 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:31 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:42 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 10:46 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] libxc: support for arm64 Image format Ian Campbell
2013-11-11 14:28 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] libxc: arm64 vcpu initialisation Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:09 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-11 15:03 ` Julien Grall
2013-11-07 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] libxl: build a device tree for ARM guests Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:30 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-07 17:41 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-07 17:47 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-08 9:30 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-08 15:14 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-11 12:14 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-12 10:51 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5280E8DA.1080506@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).