From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] events/fifo: don't spin indefinitely when setting LINK
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:56:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52810C55.6070107@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52811626020000780010206E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 11/11/13 16:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 11.11.13 at 17:03, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> + w = read_atomic(word);
>> +
>> + for ( try = 0; try < 4; try++ )
>> + {
>> + ret = try_set_link(word, &w, link);
>> + if ( ret >= 0 )
>> + {
>> + clear_bit(EVTCHN_FIFO_BUSY, word);
>
> Considering that this is another atomic operation, wouldn't it
> make sense to have the cmpxchg() at once clear the flag,
> and hence you'd need to clear it here only when ret == 0
> (which I understand isn't the common case)?
The common case (I believe, but haven't measured it) is the first
try_set_link() call without BUSY set.
In the loop, I suspect the mostly likely write by the guest is clearing
LINKED, i.e., ret == 0.
Still, it seems easy enough to have:
for ( try = 0; try < 4; try++ )
{
ret = try_set_link(word, &w, link);
if ( ret >= 0 )
{
if ( ret == 0 )
clear_bit(EVTCHN_FIFO_BUSY, word);
return ret;
}
}
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-11 16:03 [PATCHv3 0/2] Xen: FIFO-based event channel ABI fixes David Vrabel
2013-11-11 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] events/fifo: don't spin indefinitely when setting LINK David Vrabel
2013-11-11 16:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 16:56 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-11-11 17:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] events/fifo: don't corrupt queues if an old tail moves queues David Vrabel
2013-11-11 16:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 17:47 ` David Vrabel
2013-11-12 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52810C55.6070107@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dvrabel@cantab.net \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).