xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] events/fifo: don't spin indefinitely when setting LINK
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:56:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52810C55.6070107@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52811626020000780010206E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 11/11/13 16:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 11.11.13 at 17:03, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
>> +    w = read_atomic(word);
>> +
>> +    for ( try = 0; try < 4; try++ )
>> +    {
>> +        ret = try_set_link(word, &w, link);
>> +        if ( ret >= 0 )
>> +        {
>> +            clear_bit(EVTCHN_FIFO_BUSY, word);
> 
> Considering that this is another atomic operation, wouldn't it
> make sense to have the cmpxchg() at once clear the flag,
> and hence you'd need to clear it here only when ret == 0
> (which I understand isn't the common case)?

The common case (I believe, but haven't measured it) is the first
try_set_link() call without BUSY set.

In the loop, I suspect the mostly likely write by the guest is clearing
LINKED, i.e., ret == 0.

Still, it seems easy enough to have:

    for ( try = 0; try < 4; try++ )
    {
        ret = try_set_link(word, &w, link);
        if ( ret >= 0 )
        {
            if ( ret == 0 )
                clear_bit(EVTCHN_FIFO_BUSY, word);
            return ret;
        }
    }

David

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-11 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-11 16:03 [PATCHv3 0/2] Xen: FIFO-based event channel ABI fixes David Vrabel
2013-11-11 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] events/fifo: don't spin indefinitely when setting LINK David Vrabel
2013-11-11 16:38   ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 16:56     ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-11-11 17:03       ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] events/fifo: don't corrupt queues if an old tail moves queues David Vrabel
2013-11-11 16:46   ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 17:47     ` David Vrabel
2013-11-12  8:14       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52810C55.6070107@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=dvrabel@cantab.net \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).