From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: Xen osstest on Calxeda midway progress (Was: Re: [xen-unstable test] 21486: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:58:29 +0000 Message-ID: <52823405.7050700@linaro.org> References: <1383731526.26213.25.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1383731526.26213.25.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , "xen.org" Cc: Andre Przywara , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11/06/2013 09:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 06:52 +0000, xen.org wrote: > >> flight 21486 xen-unstable real [real] >> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/21486/ > [...] >> test-armhf-armhf-xl 5 xen-boot fail never pass > > Switching the ARM tests over to Linux 3.12 means we now get much further > and run into: > > (from http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/21486/test-armhf-armhf-xl/serial-marilith-n5.txt) > >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.136164] sata_highbank gpio_request 0 failed: -517 >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.140696] highbank-ahci ffe08000.sata: AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 5 ports 3 Gbps 0x1f impl platform mode >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.149152] highbank-ahci ffe08000.sata: flags: 64bit ncq sntf stag pm led clo only pmp pio slum part ccc apst >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.159435] scsi0 : sata_highbank >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.162451] scsi1 : sata_highbank >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.165490] scsi2 : sata_highbank >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.168516] scsi3 : sata_highbank >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.171566] scsi4 : sata_highbank >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.174606] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x100 irq 115 >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.181779] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x180 irq 115 >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.189060] ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x200 irq 115 >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.196323] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x280 irq 115 > [...] >> [Wed Nov 6 02:34:54 2013][ 1.203581] ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio [mem 0xffe08000-0xffe17fff] port 0x300 irq 115 >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:04 2013][ 10.353721] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:14 2013][ 19.362722] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:49 2013][ 50.871721] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:49 2013][ 50.876019] ata1: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5 Gbps >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:54 2013][ 55.389720] ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:54 2013][ 55.394018] ata1: reset failed, giving up >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:55 2013][ 55.704724] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:55 2013][ 56.019724] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:55 2013][ 56.334723] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:56 2013][ 56.649722] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > [...] >> [Wed Nov 6 02:35:56 2013]Begin: Mounting root file system ... Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ... Volume group "marilith-n5" not found > ... fail to find root. > Hi, Sorry I'm a bit late to answer. > Has anyone seen this before, is it a known 3.12 on Midway issue perhaps? This is due to an interrupt issue. If you apply my non-yet-reworking interrupts patch series, all theses errors will disappear. Cheers, -- Julien Grall