From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] xl: match output of vcpu-list with pinning syntax Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:50:05 +0000 Message-ID: <5284AADD.7060908@eu.citrix.com> References: <20131113190852.18086.5437.stgit@Solace> <20131113191106.18086.38302.stgit@Solace> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131113191106.18086.38302.stgit@Solace> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Marcus Granado , Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Li Yechen , Andrew Cooper , Juergen Gross , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , Justin Weaver , Matt Wilson , Elena Ufimtseva List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 13/11/13 19:11, Dario Faggioli wrote: > in fact, pinning to all the pcpus happens by specifying "all" > (either on the command line or in the config file), while `xl > vcpu-list' report it as "any cpu". > > Change this into something more consistent, by using "all" > everywhere. While I can see a certain logic to having the specification and the output match, there is a part of me that really prefers the "any" syntax in the output. This is just expressing a preference, not a nack; if others think it would be better to be consistent, I won't argue the case. -George