xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: netback: Delayed copy alternative
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:04:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5284AE3C.8070009@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD0172846@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>

On 14/11/13 09:42, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to forward port delayed copy to my new grant mapping patches.
>> One important problem I've faced is that classic used
>> gnttab_copy_grant_page to replace the granted page with a local copy and
>> unmap the grant. And this function has never been upstreamed as only
>> netback used it. Unfortunately upstreaming it is not a very easy task,
>> as the kernel's grant table infrastructure doesn't track at the moment
>> whether the page is DMA mapped or not. It is required because we
>> shouldn't proceed with the copy and replace if a device already mapped
>> the page for DMA.
>>
>> David came up with an alternative idea: we do this delayed copy because
>> we don't want the guest's page to get stucked in Dom0 indefinitely. The
>> only realistic case for that would be if the egress interface would be
>> an another guest's vif, where the guest (either due to a bug or as a
>> malicious attempt) doesn't empty its ring. I think it's a safe
>> assumption that Dom0 otherwise doesn't hold on to packets for too long.
>> Or if it does, then that's a bug we should fix instead of doing a copy
>> of the packet.
>>
>> If we accept that only other vif's can keep the skb indefinitely, then
>> an easier solution would be to handle this problem on the RX side: the
>> RX thread can also check whether this skb hanged around for too long and
>> drop it. Actually, xenvif_start_xmit already checks if the guest
>> provided enough slots for us to do the grant copy. If I understand it
>> correctly. What do you think about such an approach?
>>
> 
> Well, now that David fixed the DMA unmap tracking thing, I believe
> that another vif is *generally* the only place an skb can hang around
> for a long time. The problem is that there is an edge case... If a
> network driver turns off queue processing (for flow control reasons, and
> NB that 10G Ethernet requires the driver to do this if the PHY signals
> flow control and internal buffering is exhausted, 1G is allowed to be an
> open drain) then the skb can sit in the queue indefinitely and there's
> no way you can deal with this from the guest RX side of netback. You
> need to have a copy-aside option to handle this.

But the delayed copy won't always help in this case as the packet may be
DMA mapped and queued on hardware queues.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-14 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 20:29 netback: Delayed copy alternative Zoltan Kiss
2013-11-14  9:42 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-14 11:04   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-11-14 19:27   ` Timout packets in device's TX queue Zoltan Kiss
2013-11-19 16:42 ` netback: Delayed copy alternative Zoltan Kiss
2013-11-20 11:16   ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-20 12:28     ` Zoltan Kiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5284AE3C.8070009@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).