From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] xen: sched: make space for
	cpu_soft_affinity
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:07:05 +0000
Message-ID: <5285F249.80004@eu.citrix.com>
References: <20131113190852.18086.5437.stgit@Solace>	
	<20131113191151.18086.37783.stgit@Solace>
	<5284E655.3060308@eu.citrix.com> <1384445656.29902.158.camel@Abyss>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1384445656.29902.158.camel@Abyss>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Li Yechen <lccycc123@gmail.com>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>, Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 14/11/13 16:14, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On gio, 2013-11-14 at 15:03 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
>> The breakdown of this in the series doesn't make much sense to me -- I
>> would have folded this one and patch 10 (use soft affinity instead of
>> node affinity) together, and put it in after patch 07
>> (s/affinity/hard_affinity/g;).
>>
> I see. Well, looks like I'm respinning it. While at it, I'll see if I
> can put it that way.
>
> If I do (and provided that does not imply any code change in those
> patches), can I retain your Reviewed-by tag in the result?

Yes, if you do a plain merge of this with patch 10 and don't make any 
changes, go ahead and keep it.

  -George