From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: Code freezing point reached
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:50:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528B4280.4090609@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZYH7_CicH2W7b17LbPiKLuScDmYVEf5CQV7ZpPrWCC4ow@mail.gmail.com>
On 18/11/13 19:19, George Dunlap wrote:
> This information will be mirrored on the Xen 4.4 Roadmap wiki page:
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap/4.4
>
> (And I actually updated the wiki this time.)
>
> The code "freezing point" is today; which means that starting today
> non-bug fixes need a freeze exception to be included.
>
> Remember our goal for the release:
> 1. A bug-free release
> 2. An awesome release
> 3. An on-time release
>
> Accepting a new feature may make Xen more awesome; but it also
> introduces a risk that it will introduce more bugs. That bug may be
> found before the release (threatening #3), or it may not be found
> until after the release (threatening #1). Each freeze exception
> request will attempt to balance the benefits (how awesome the
> exception is) vs the risks (will it cause the release to slip, or
> worse, cause a bug which goes un-noticed into the final release).
>
> The idea is that today we will be pretty permissive, but that we will
> become progressively more conservative until the first RC, which is
> scheduled for 3 weeks' time (6 December). After that, we will only
> accept bug fixes.
>
> Bug fixes can be checked in without a freeze exception throughout the
> code freeze, unless the maintianer thinks they are particularly high
> risk. In later RC's, we may even begin rejecting bug fixes if the
> broken functionality is small and the risk to other functionality is
> high.
>
> Features which are currently marked "experimental" or do not at the
> moment work at all cannot be broken really; so changes to code only
> used by those features should be able to get a freeze exception
> easily. (Tianocore is something which would probably fall under
> this.)
>
> Features which change or add new interfaces which will need to be
> supported in a backwards-compatible way (for instance, vNUMA) will
> need freeze exceptions to make sure that the interface itself has
> enough time to be considered stable.
>
> These are guidelines and principles to give you an idea where we're
> coming from; if you think there's a good reason why making an
> exception for you will help us achieve goals 1-3 above better than not
> doing so, feel free to make your case.
>
> = Timeline =
>
> Here is our current timeline based on a 6-month release:
>
> * Feature freeze: 18 October 2013
> * Code freezing point: 18 November 2013 <== WE ARE HERE
> * First RC: 6 December 2013
> * Release: 21 January 2014
>
> Last updated: 18 November 2016
>
> == Completed ==
>
> * Event channel scalability (FIFO event channels)
>
> * Non-udev scripts for driver domains (non-Linux driver domains)
>
> * Multi-vector PCI MSI (Hypervisor side)
>
> * Improved Spice support on libxl
> - Added Spice vdagent support
> - Added Spice clipboard sharing support
>
> * PHV domU (experimental only)
>
> * Guest EFI booting (tianocore)
>
> * kexec
>
> * Testing: Xen on ARM
>
> * Update to SeaBIOS 1.7.3.1
>
> * pvgrub2 checked into grub upstream
* Driver domain userspace daemon.
>
> == Resolved since last update ==
>
> * credit scheduler doesn't update other fields when tslice updated from sysctl
>
> == Open ==
>
> * qemu-upstream not freeing pirq
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/281498
> status: patches posted; latest patches need testing
>
> * Race in PV shutdown between tool detection and shutdown watch
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/282467
> > Nothing to do with ACPI
> status: Patches posted
>
> * Supposed regression from a3513737 ("x86: allow guest to set/clear
> > MSI-X mask bit (try 2)"), as per
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-09/msg01589.html.
>
> * qemu-traditional mis-parses host bus 8 as 0
> > http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/15
>
> * xen_platform_pci=0 doesn't work with qemu-xen
> > http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/20
>
> * xl does not support specifying virtual function for passthrough device
> > http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/22
>
> * xl does not handle migrate interruption gracefully
> > If you start a localhost migrate, and press "Ctrl-C" in the middle,
> > you get two hung domains
>
> * libxl / xl does not handle failure of remote qemu gracefully
> > Easiest way to reproduce:
> > - set "vncunused=0" and do a local migrate
> > - The "remote" qemu will fail because the vnc port is in use
> > The failure isn't the problem, but everything being stuck afterwards is
>
> * HPET interrupt stack overflow (when using hpet_broadcast mode and MSI
> capable HPETs)
> owner: andyh@citrix
> status: patches posted, undergoing review iteration.
>
> == Backlog ==
>
> === Testing coverage ===
>
> * new libxl w/ previous versions of xl
> @IanJ
>
> * Host S3 suspend
> @bguthro, @dariof
>
> * Default [example] XSM policy
> @Stefano to ask Daniel D
>
> * Storage driver domains
> @roger
>
> * HVM pci passthrough
> @anthony
>
> * PV pci passthrough
> @konrad (or @george if he gets to it first)
>
> * Network driver domains
> @George
>
> * Nested virt?
> @intel (chased by George)
>
> * Fix SRIOV test (chase intel)
> @ianj
>
> * Fix bisector to e-mail blame-worthy parties
> @ianj
>
> * Fix xl shutdown
> @ianj
>
> * stub domains
> @athony
>
> * performance benchmarks
> @dario
>
> === Meta-items (composed of other items) ===
>
> * Meta: PVIO NUMA improvements
> - NUMA affinity for vcpus (4.4 possible)
> - PV guest NUMA interface (4.4 possible)
> - Sensible dom0 NUMA layout
> - Toolstack pinning backend thread / virq to appropraite d0 vcpu
> - NUMA-aware ballooning
>
> * xend still in tree (x)
> - xl list -l on a dom0-only system
> - xl list -l doesn't contain tty console port
> - xl Alternate transport support for migration*
> - xl PVSCSI support
> - xl PVUSB support
>
> === Big ticket items ===
>
> * PVH mode (w/ Linux)
> owner: mukesh@oracle, george@citrix
> status (Linux): Acked, waiting for ABI to be nailed down
> status (Xen): Initial version checked in, still nailing down interface
>
> * Update to qemu 1.6
> owner: Anthonyper
> status: In staging, still working out a bug in the VMX code
>
> * Live Migration Support
> owner: Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com>
> status: v5 posted, looking good for code freeze
>
> * ARM64 guest
> owner: IanC
> status: v3 posted, v4 in progress. looking good.
>
> * SWIOTLB (kernel side thing)
> owner: Stefano
> status: Pull request sent.
>
> * soft affinity for vcpus (was NUMA affinity for vcpus)
> owner: Dario
> status: v2 posted
>
> * PV guest NUMA interface
> owner: Elena
> status: v3 posted
>
> * libvirt/libxl integration (external)
> - owner: jfehlig@suse, dario@citrix
> - patches posted (should be released before 4.4)
> - migration
> - PCI pass-through
> - In progress
> - integration w/ libvirt's lock manager
> - improved concurrency
>
> * xl USB pass-through for HVM guests using Qemu USB emulation
> prognosis: Good if extended
> owner: George
> status: v6 patch series posted
>
> * libxl: Spice usbredirection support for upstream qemu
> owner: fabio@M2R
> status: I'll post new patch version shortly
>
> * libxl: usb2 and usb3 controller support for upstream qemu
> owner: fabio@M2R
> status: patch v5 posted, tested and working, awaiting reviews
>
> * libxl network buffering support for Remus
> @shriram
> status: patches posted
> prognosis: fair
>
> * Disk: indirect descriptors
> owner: roger@citrix
> status: Linux side in 3.11, Xen-side patch posted
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-19 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-18 18:19 Xen 4.4 development update: Code freezing point reached George Dunlap
2013-11-18 18:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-18 19:22 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2013-11-19 16:18 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 0:59 ` Don Slutz
2013-11-19 17:46 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 10:50 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2013-11-19 11:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 11:31 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-11-19 14:00 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-19 14:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-19 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-19 15:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-19 17:52 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-19 19:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-20 3:17 ` Zhenzhong Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528B4280.4090609@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).