From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow control
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:53:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529C74C2.5040105@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD0195079@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
On 28/11/13 16:33, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 28 November 2013 16:27
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: Wei Liu; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Ian Campbell; David Vrabel
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow
>> control
> [snip]
>
>>>> I'm afraid this starting point is not correct. Consider you have a SKB
>>>> with very large linear buffer, you might need more than 2 slots to fit
>>>> that in, right?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was wondering about that. Would a roundup of mtu to the nearest 4k
>> boundary be sufficient?
>>>
>>
>> I think we can reuse the logic in xenvif_gop_skb, there's a snippet used
>> to calculate how many slots are necessary for linear area. We just need
>> to avoid pulling requrests from the ring.
>>
>
> Actually, DIV_ROUND(skb_headlen(skb), PAGE_SIZE) should give a cheap
> upper bound, shouldn't it? I don't want the code here to get too
> complex.
Make sure it does the right thing if the head is not page aligned etc.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 13:11 [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow control Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 15:51 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-28 16:05 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 16:27 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-28 16:33 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 16:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-02 11:53 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-11-29 8:20 ` annie li
2013-11-29 10:03 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-01 4:18 ` annie li
2013-12-02 10:52 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-02 11:52 ` David Vrabel
2013-12-02 11:55 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-02 11:59 ` David Vrabel
2013-12-02 12:01 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-03 20:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529C74C2.5040105@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).