From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow control
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:59:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529C7622.90901@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD019C3D2@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
On 02/12/13 11:55, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Vrabel
>> Sent: 02 December 2013 11:52
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wei Liu; Ian Campbell
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow
>> control
>>
>> On 28/11/13 13:11, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> The flow control code relies on a double pass of tke skb, firstly to count
>>> the number of ring slots needed to supply sufficient grant references, and
>>> another to actually consume those references and build the grant copy
>>> operations. It transpires that, in some scenarios, the initial count and the
>>> number of references consumed differs and, after this happens a number
>> of
>>> times, flow control is completely broken.
>>
>> Can you describe in more detail the cases where it gets it wrong?
>>
>
> I've already elaborated on this thread (at Annie Li's request). That
> explanation is probably a little long for inclusion in the comment though.
I understand that count_slot() going wrong is bad. What specifically is
it counting incorrectly. What frag layout is causing it? If this is
understood there may be a more more minimal patch we can mark for stable.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 13:11 [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: improve guest-receive-side flow control Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 15:51 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-28 16:05 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 16:27 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-28 16:33 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-28 16:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-02 11:53 ` David Vrabel
2013-11-29 8:20 ` annie li
2013-11-29 10:03 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-01 4:18 ` annie li
2013-12-02 10:52 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-02 11:52 ` David Vrabel
2013-12-02 11:55 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-02 11:59 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-12-02 12:01 ` Paul Durrant
2013-12-03 20:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529C7622.90901@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).