From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen-4.3 and -unstable regression from changeset "numa-sched: leave node-affinity alone if not in 'auto' mode"
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:01:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529C92D3.8070307@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529874BB.7070803@citrix.com>
On 29/11/13 11:04, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/11/13 10:51, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 21:17 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> the XenServer patch queue on
>> Are you positive that the bug is in the underlying Xen tree and not some
>> interaction with a patch in your queue?
>>
>> A boot time issue ought to be reasonably easy to test with a bare tree.
>>
>> Ian.
>>
> I am not sure of anything at the moment, although I have found one
> instance of a crash with none of the XenServer patch queue whatsoever.
>
> At the moment, I have narrowed the problem down to a handful of
> instructions writing 0s into a well-formed region of the stack.
> Clearly, this is not correct, and every tweak of the debugging causes
> the problem to jump around.
>
> ~Andrew
After some more investigation, this is not a regression at all, although
the patch is directly relevant to identifying the problem.
PXELINUX 4.04 2011-04-18 Copyright (C) 1994-2011 H. Peter Anvin et al
boot:
Loading xenrt/xen-minnow.gz... ok
Loading xenrt/vmlinuz... ok
After multiboot magic check
Opcode from 0x105fef: 97 0e 00 00 49 8d be b0
Before lret into trampoline
Opcode from 0x105fef: 97 0e 00 00 49 8d be b0
After (failed) conditional jmp to start_secondary
Opcode from 0xffff830000105fef: 97 0e 86 00 49 8d be b0
__ __ _ _ _____ _
\ \/ /___ _ __ | || | |___ / / |
\ // _ \ '_ \ | || |_ |_ \ | |
Something between entering the trampoline and emerging in 64bit mode is
corrupting a single byte at phys 0x105ff1 from its correct value to a
value of 0x86.
The corruption disappears if the "no-real-mode" is used.
Currently the BIOS is trying to be updated, but the intersection of
operating systems which will successfully boot, and will successfully
run the IBM update tool is rather low.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 12:31 Xen-4.3 and -unstable regression from changeset "numa-sched: leave node-affinity alone if not in 'auto' mode" Andrew Cooper
2013-11-28 13:05 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-28 15:09 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-28 15:14 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-28 15:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-28 21:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-28 23:30 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-29 10:51 ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-29 11:04 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-12-02 14:01 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-12-02 14:36 ` Jan Beulich
2013-12-03 19:53 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529C92D3.8070307@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).