From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Simon Martin <smartin@milliways.cl>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:20:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529F101A.2010505@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386109467-9095-1-git-send-email-nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
On 12/03/2013 10:24 PM, Nathan Studer wrote:
> From: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
>
> Update the arinc653 scheduler to support CPU cpu pools.
>
> These changes do not implement arinc653 multicore. Since the schedule only
> supports 1 vcpu entry per slot, even if the vcpus of a domain are run on
> multiple pcpus, the scheduler will essentially serialize their execution.
>
> The formatting patch from the original series has already been applied and
> has been dropped from v2.
>
> George, you granted a release-ack for the original series, which I sent
> in almost two weeks ago (I left on paternity leave in the meantime).
> I would argue that this functionality could be granted an exception for
> the same reasons you listed in your original release-ack, but if this is
> no longer the case, I defer to your judgement.
Just as a reminder, the original reasons were that the changes are
limited to arinc653-related code, and that there are as far as we know
no other users at present.
Release-acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 22:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support Nathan Studer
2013-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arinc: Add cpu-pool support to scheduler Nathan Studer
2013-12-04 11:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arinc: Add poolid parameter to scheduler get/set functions Nathan Studer
2013-12-04 10:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-04 11:20 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-12-04 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529F101A.2010505@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=nate.studer@dornerworks.com \
--cc=robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com \
--cc=smartin@milliways.cl \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).