From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arinc: Implement cpu-pool support Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:20:58 +0000 Message-ID: <529F101A.2010505@eu.citrix.com> References: <1386109467-9095-1-git-send-email-nate.studer@dornerworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1386109467-9095-1-git-send-email-nate.studer@dornerworks.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Nathan Studer , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Simon Martin , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Robert VanVossen List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/03/2013 10:24 PM, Nathan Studer wrote: > From: Nathan Studer > > Update the arinc653 scheduler to support CPU cpu pools. > > These changes do not implement arinc653 multicore. Since the schedule only > supports 1 vcpu entry per slot, even if the vcpus of a domain are run on > multiple pcpus, the scheduler will essentially serialize their execution. > > The formatting patch from the original series has already been applied and > has been dropped from v2. > > George, you granted a release-ack for the original series, which I sent > in almost two weeks ago (I left on paternity leave in the meantime). > I would argue that this functionality could be granted an exception for > the same reasons you listed in your original release-ack, but if this is > no longer the case, I defer to your judgement. Just as a reminder, the original reasons were that the changes are limited to arinc653-related code, and that there are as far as we know no other users at present. Release-acked-by: George Dunlap