From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sassy Natan Subject: Re: Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:48:53 +0200 Message-ID: <529a12f41001120348y1ba3e7a9xd25bc23ea1b35ff5@mail.gmail.com> References: <529a12f41001120331y6f273787kf193aeed6733902@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0867359127==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0867359127== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0b254fa4c79047cf63c34 --000e0ce0b254fa4c79047cf63c34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OK, Thanks for the quick answer. Can u please tell me which branch I should download from Jeremy git server in order to test it? 10x again Sassy On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Keir Fraser wrote: > You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel includes > dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or > Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by > default > by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that doesn't > mean you *have* to use it. > > -- Keir > > On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" wrote: > > > Hi Keir, Xen Group ... > > > > Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel version > this > > version support? > > Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub the > new > > version from Jeremy branches? > > > > To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default with the > > pv_ops mechanism on the dom0. > > But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a > dom0 > > support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops). > > > > So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the > kernel > > mainline? > > > > According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have Xen > Dom0 > > support in the kernel mainline. see more here: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992 > > > > Can you please provide more feedback on this issue? > > > > > > Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open source this > > amazing virtualization system. > > Sassy > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser > > wrote: > >> Folks, > >> > >> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and published. > >> > >> You can grab it from here: > >> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1') > >> > >> Please test it! > >> > >> -- Keir > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Xen-devel mailing list > >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > > > > --000e0ce0b254fa4c79047cf63c34 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
OK,
Thanks for the quick answer.
=A0
Can u please tell me which branch I should download from Jeremy git se= rver in order to test it?
=A0
10x again
Sassy

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser= @eu.citrix.com> wrote:
You can use any kernel as dom0 f= or Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel includes
dom0 support. So that could = be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or
Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by de= fault
by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but = that doesn't
mean you *have* to use it.
<= br> =A0-- Keir

On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@gmail.com> wrote:

>= Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
> =A0
> Just to make things more=A0clea= r, I wanted to know which=A0kernel version this
> version support?
> Is it still work with the old stable kernel= =A02.6.18 or=A0should I=A0grub the new
> version from Jeremy branches= ?
> =A0
> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work= by default with the
> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
> But at the moment the latest sta= ble kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a dom0
> support but only domU s= upport (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
> =A0
> So, Does the release= of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the kernel
> mainline?
> =A0
> According to Jeremy there is quite more = work to do in-order to have Xen Dom0
> support in the kernel mainline= . see more here:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.co= mp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
> =A0
> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>= ; =A0
> =A0
> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing= to the open source this
> amazing virtualization system.
> Sas= sy
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
> wrote:>> Folks,
>>
>> The first release candidate for Xe= n 4.0.0 has been tagged and published.
>>
>> You can grab it from here:
>> http://xenbits.= xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1')
>><= br> >> Please test it!
>>
>> =A0-- Keir
>>
= >>
>>
>> __________________________________________= _____
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>


=

--000e0ce0b254fa4c79047cf63c34-- --===============0867359127== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0867359127==--