From: Sassy Natan <sassyn@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Xen List <xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] DomU as Dom0?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:23:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529a12f41002112223j4bd55064y427cdb9dc84315f6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265924495.9385.84.camel@agari.van.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]
OK,
Thanks for the answers
Sassy
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Stodden
<daniel.stodden@citrix.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:43 -0500, Sassy Natan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Can I run on DomU a Dom0 Kernel? So that This DomU will act as a Dom0
> > for other DomU on top of it?
>
> Domains don't stack. There's no concept of one domain running on top of
> a different one, not even with the original dom0.
>
> But many of the tasks dom0 performs on behalf of domU's could be done by
> other domUs as well. Primary example would be I/O virtualization for
> normal, non-privileged guests.
>
> So the dependency graph you can build for a 'service' model is *much*
> more flexible than the rather static 3-level block scheme depicting the
> bare binary interface.
>
> That's maybe not the answer you were looking for.
>
> If you're rather looking for recursive virtualization, I don't think
> that's going to fly all that well either.
>
> Daniel
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1485 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 137 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 19:43 DomU as Dom0? Sassy Natan
2010-02-11 20:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-11 21:41 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-02-12 6:23 ` Sassy Natan [this message]
2010-02-12 7:46 ` Thomas Goirand
2010-02-12 9:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-02-15 10:16 ` Daniel Stodden
2010-02-15 12:08 ` Sassy Natan
2010-02-15 16:32 ` Dong, Eddie
2010-02-16 15:50 ` [Xen-users] " Javier Guerra
2010-02-17 3:25 ` RE: [Xen-devel] " Dong, Eddie
2010-02-12 15:06 ` Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-13 17:58 Steven Maresca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529a12f41002112223j4bd55064y427cdb9dc84315f6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sassyn@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.stodden@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xen-users@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).