Re: DomU as Dom0?

[Sassy Natan <sassyn@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1604 bytes --]

WOW, This topic become a hot one.

I in a middle of written an overview about virtualized the virtual.
Thanks for all the pepole who respones to this email.

I will send my papaer once I will finish it :-)

Thanks for all

Xen is really cool project!

Sassy

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Stodden
<daniel.stodden@citrix.com>wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 02:46 -0500, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Sassy Natan wrote:
> > > OK,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the answers
> > >
> > > Sassy
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Stodden
> > > <daniel.stodden@citrix.com <mailto:daniel.stodden@citrix.com>> wrote:
> > >     If you're rather looking for recursive virtualization, I don't
> think
> > >     that's going to fly all that well either.
> > >
> > >     Daniel
> >
> >
> > It's called "nested virtualization" (not recursive) and there was a talk
> > about it on the last Xen Summit in Shanghai. I suggest you to read the
> > video:
> >
> > http://www.xen.org/files/xensummit_intel09/xensummit-nested-virt.pdf
> >
> http://www.xen.org/media/Movies/XenSummitAsia09/2009-11-19-afternoon/NestedVirtualization.MTS
>
> Ah, nice. I didn't expect VMX emulation be actually in the works
> somewhere. Cool, thanks for the link.
>
> "Recursive" was the original term for such a beast.
>
> Any estimates on the footprint? Small enough to be a candidate for
> inclusion? It'd certainly be interesting for some applications.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2771 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel