From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: Is PVH a blocker? Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:50:54 +0000 Message-ID: <52AEDB0E.30707@eu.citrix.com> References: <20131213194326.GA28712@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131213194326.GA28712@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/13/2013 07:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> == Open == >> > Also, xl as opposed to xend, allows me to share a disk without > any fanfare. > > Meaning I can do this: > > xl block-attach phy:/dev/sda latest1 xvda w > xl block-attach phy:/dev/sda latest2 xvda w > > while if I had used 'xend' I had to also append the '!' parameter > to denote it as 'shared'. Is xl intended to have that level of information? The 'l' originally meant "light". -George