From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Multiple issues with event channel on Xen on ARM
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:44:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F2403D.7080006@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F23DEE.7080601@citrix.com>
On 02/05/2014 01:34 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
Hello David,
> I think the following patch should fix the 2-level problems.
>
> You can force the use of 2-level events by using the xen.fifo_events=0
> Linux command line option.
Thanks for the patch, I'm now able to use 2-level events without issue
for a guest.
Now, I need to look at the fifo events when the domain is killed.
> 8<-------------------------------------------------
> xen/events: bind all new interdomain events to VCPU0
>
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>
> Commit fc087e10734a4d3e40693fc099461ec1270b3fff (xen/events: remove
> unnecessary init_evtchn_cpu_bindings()) causes a regression.
>
> The kernel-side VCPU binding was not being correctly set for newly
> allocated or bound interdomain events. In ARM guests where 2-level
> events were used, this would result in no interdomain events being
> handled because the local VCPU masks would all be clear.
>
> x86 guests would work because the irq affinity was set during irq
> setup and this would set the correct kernel-side VCPU binding.
>
> Fix this by by properly initializing the kernel-side VCPU binding in
> bind_evtchn_to_irq().
>
> Reported-by: Julian Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
s/Julian/Julien/
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Tested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Regards,
> ---
> drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> index 4672e00..5cc1f78 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> @@ -862,6 +862,9 @@ int bind_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned int evtchn)
> irq = ret;
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + /* Newly bound event channels start off on VCPU0. */
> + bind_evtchn_to_cpu(evtchn, 0);
> } else {
> struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
> WARN_ON(info == NULL || info->type != IRQT_EVTCHN);
>
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-04 23:18 Multiple issues with event channel on Xen on ARM Julien Grall
2014-02-05 10:09 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-05 10:33 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-05 10:45 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-05 13:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-05 13:44 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-02-05 13:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-05 13:58 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F2403D.7080006@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).