From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] xen: arm: correct terminology for cache flush macros
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:10:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F4DB49.3070502@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391775176-30313-5-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
On 07/02/14 12:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The term "flush" is slightly ambiguous. The correct ARM term for for this
> operaton is clean, as opposed to clean+invalidate for which we also now have a
> function.
>
> This is a pure rename, no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
> ---
> This could easily be left for 4.5.
It would be nice to have a common nomenclature for the functions (a bit
like your TLB patch series).
But, if the patch don't go in Xen 4.4, it won't change anything to
backporting. The function name is not reused.
--
Julien Grall
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 12:12 [PATCH 0/5 v4] xen/arm: fix guest builder cache cohenrency (again, again) Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] xen: arm: rename create_p2m_entries to apply_p2m_changes Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] xen: arm: rename p2m next_gfn_to_relinquish to lowest_mapped_gfn Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] xen/arm: clean and invalidate all guest caches by VMID after domain build Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-07 14:34 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 13:49 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-10 14:02 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 14:26 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-11 13:29 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 13:24 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 14:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 15:01 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Revert "xen: arm: force guest memory accesses to cacheable when MMU is disabled" Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 12:12 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] xen: arm: correct terminology for cache flush macros Ian Campbell
2014-02-07 13:10 ` Julien Grall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F4DB49.3070502@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).