From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH-4.5 2/4] xen/arm: support HW interrupts in gic_set_lr
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:31:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F55EA4.2060703@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391799378-31664-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Hi Stefano,
On 07/02/14 18:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> If the irq to be injected is an hardware irq (p->desc != NULL), set
> GICH_LR_HW.
If you set the GICH_LR_HW, I think you should remove the EOI of physical
interrupt in maintenance IRQ in this patch. Otherwise we will EOI twice
and from the documentation the behavior is unpredicatable.
> Also add a struct vcpu* parameter to gic_set_lr.
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index acf7195..215b679 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -618,20 +618,24 @@ int __init setup_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, struct irqaction *new)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static inline void gic_set_lr(int lr, unsigned int virtual_irq,
> +static inline void gic_set_lr(struct vcpu *v, int lr, unsigned int irq,
> unsigned int state, unsigned int priority)
> {
> - int maintenance_int = GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ;
> - struct pending_irq *p = irq_to_pending(current, virtual_irq);
> + struct pending_irq *p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
>
> BUG_ON(lr >= nr_lrs);
> BUG_ON(lr < 0);
> BUG_ON(state & ~(GICH_LR_STATE_MASK<<GICH_LR_STATE_SHIFT));
>
> - GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = state |
> - maintenance_int |
> - ((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
> - ((virtual_irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);
> + if ( p->desc != NULL )
> + GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = GICH_LR_HW | state | GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ |
> + ((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
> + ((irq & GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_SHIFT) |
We should not assume that the physical IRQ == virtual IRQ. You should
use p->desc->irq
> + ((irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);
> + else
> + GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = state | GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ |
> + ((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
> + ((irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);
The final result of virtual IRQ is a subset of the physical IRQ. Can you
factor the code?
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 18:56 [PATCH-4.5 0/4] remove maintenance interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 1/4] xen/arm: remove unused virtual parameter from vgic_vcpu_inject_irq Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:06 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 2/4] xen/arm: support HW interrupts in gic_set_lr Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:31 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-02-10 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 3/4] xen/arm: do not request maintenance_interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:45 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:21 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 23:10 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:18 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:33 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:11 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 4/4] xen/arm: set GICH_HCR_NPIE if all the LRs are in use Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 23:39 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 16:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:14 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 23:22 ` [PATCH-4.5 0/4] remove maintenance interrupts Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F55EA4.2060703@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).