xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH-4.5 2/4] xen/arm: support HW interrupts in gic_set_lr
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:31:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F55EA4.2060703@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391799378-31664-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

Hi Stefano,

On 07/02/14 18:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> If the irq to be injected is an hardware irq (p->desc != NULL), set
> GICH_LR_HW.

If you set the GICH_LR_HW, I think you should remove the EOI of physical 
interrupt in maintenance IRQ in this patch. Otherwise we will EOI twice 
and from the documentation the behavior is unpredicatable.

> Also add a struct vcpu* parameter to gic_set_lr.
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
>   xen/arch/arm/gic.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index acf7195..215b679 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -618,20 +618,24 @@ int __init setup_dt_irq(const struct dt_irq *irq, struct irqaction *new)
>       return rc;
>   }
>
> -static inline void gic_set_lr(int lr, unsigned int virtual_irq,
> +static inline void gic_set_lr(struct vcpu *v, int lr, unsigned int irq,
>           unsigned int state, unsigned int priority)
>   {
> -    int maintenance_int = GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ;
> -    struct pending_irq *p = irq_to_pending(current, virtual_irq);
> +    struct pending_irq *p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
>
>       BUG_ON(lr >= nr_lrs);
>       BUG_ON(lr < 0);
>       BUG_ON(state & ~(GICH_LR_STATE_MASK<<GICH_LR_STATE_SHIFT));
>
> -    GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = state |
> -        maintenance_int |
> -        ((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
> -        ((virtual_irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);
> +    if ( p->desc != NULL )
> +        GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = GICH_LR_HW | state | GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ |
> +            ((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
> +            ((irq & GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_SHIFT) |

We should not assume that the physical IRQ == virtual IRQ. You should 
use p->desc->irq

> +            ((irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);
> +    else
> +        GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = state | GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ |
> +            ((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
> +            ((irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);

The final result of virtual IRQ is a subset of the physical IRQ. Can you 
factor the code?

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-07 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 18:56 [PATCH-4.5 0/4] remove maintenance interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 1/4] xen/arm: remove unused virtual parameter from vgic_vcpu_inject_irq Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:06   ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 2/4] xen/arm: support HW interrupts in gic_set_lr Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:31   ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-02-10 16:50     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 3/4] xen/arm: do not request maintenance_interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:45   ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:03     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:21       ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 23:10   ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:06     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:09       ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:16         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:18           ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:24             ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:33               ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:11       ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 4/4] xen/arm: set GICH_HCR_NPIE if all the LRs are in use Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 23:39   ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 16:59     ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:14       ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:16         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 23:22 ` [PATCH-4.5 0/4] remove maintenance interrupts Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:08   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52F55EA4.2060703@linaro.org \
    --to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).