From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: julien.grall@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH-4.5 3/4] xen/arm: do not request maintenance_interrupts
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:45:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F56208.3090504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391799378-31664-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Hi Stefano,
On 07/02/14 18:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Do not set GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ for every interrupt with set in the
> GICH_LR registers.
>
> Introduce a new function, gic_clear_lrs, that goes over the GICH_LR
> registers, clear the invalid ones and free the corresponding interrupts
> from the inflight queue if appropriate. Add the interrupt to lr_pending
> if the GIC_IRQ_GUEST_PENDING is still set.
>
> Call gic_clear_lrs from gic_restore_state and on return to guest
> (gic_inject).
>
> Remove the now unused code in maintenance_interrupts and gic_irq_eoi.
>
> In vgic_vcpu_inject_irq, if the target is a vcpu running on another cpu,
> send and SGI to it to interrupt it and force it to clear the old LRs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 3 +-
> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index 215b679..87bd5d3 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +static void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v)
> +{
> + struct pending_irq *p;
> + int i = 0, irq;
> + uint32_t lr;
> + bool_t inflight;
> +
> + ASSERT(!local_irq_is_enabled());
> +
> + while ((i = find_next_bit((const long unsigned int *) &this_cpu(lr_mask),
> + nr_lrs, i)) < nr_lrs) {
> + lr = GICH[GICH_LR + i];
> + if ( !(lr & (GICH_LR_PENDING|GICH_LR_ACTIVE)) )
> + {
> + if ( lr & GICH_LR_HW )
> + irq = (lr >> GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_SHIFT) & GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_MASK;
> + else
> + irq = (lr >> GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT) & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK;
> +
The if sentence can be simply by:
irq = (lr >> GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT) & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK;
> + inflight = 0;
> + GICH[GICH_LR + i] = 0;
> + clear_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
> +
> + spin_lock(&gic.lock);
> + p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
> + if ( p->desc != NULL )
> + p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
> + clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status);
> + if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_PENDING, &p->status) &&
> + test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status))
> + {
I would add a WARN_ON(p->desc != NULL) here. AFAIK, this code path
shouldn't be used for physical IRQ.
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 18:56 [PATCH-4.5 0/4] remove maintenance interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 1/4] xen/arm: remove unused virtual parameter from vgic_vcpu_inject_irq Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:06 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 2/4] xen/arm: support HW interrupts in gic_set_lr Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:31 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 3/4] xen/arm: do not request maintenance_interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 22:45 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-02-10 17:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:21 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 23:10 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:18 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:33 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-10 17:11 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH-4.5 4/4] xen/arm: set GICH_HCR_NPIE if all the LRs are in use Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 23:39 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 16:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-10 17:14 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-02-07 23:22 ` [PATCH-4.5 0/4] remove maintenance interrupts Julien Grall
2014-02-10 17:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F56208.3090504@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).