From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device.
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FCEDFC.7080103@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FCFAD9020000780011C2AB@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 02/13/2014 04:03 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.02.14 at 16:38, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> Konrad / Jan: Ping?
>>
>> If this fix looks reasonable it would be nice to get this in before RC4.
> It would have long been committed if the VMX maintainers finally
> gave their okay. Even privately pinging them didn't seem to help...
Oh, right, I forgot that Yang isn't a maintainer.
Well it looks like we have two options:
* Commit it without a maintainer's ack
* Revert the patch that caused the regression to PVH.
(Or maybe Yang can chase the maintainers internally.)
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 17:03 [PATCH] Xen 4.4-rc3 regression with PVH compared to Xen 4.4-rc2 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-03 17:03 ` [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-04 8:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-04 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 15:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-04 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 16:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-05 14:35 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-05 15:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-05 15:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-07 2:28 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-02-07 15:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-10 12:40 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-11 0:17 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-02-13 15:38 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-13 16:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-13 16:08 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2014-02-13 17:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-03 19:26 ` [PATCH] Xen 4.4-rc3 regression with PVH compared to Xen 4.4-rc2 Mukesh Rathor
2014-02-03 19:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-03 20:01 ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-02-04 1:16 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FCEDFC.7080103@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).