From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: (early) Xen-4.4-rc4 testing
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:56:49 +0000
Message-ID: <5301F901.6060202@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hello,

Given an available testing slot over the weekend, I ran a XenRT nightly
on current staging (c/s 4e8d89bc1445f91c4c6c7bf0ad8d51b0c809841e, "pvh:
Fix regression due to assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend
device") which I took to be roughly Xen-4.4-rc4.

This testing included David Vrabels "x86/xen: allow privcmd hypercalls
to be preempted" kernel patch

I am happy to report that everything looks in shape.  There are no new
problems compared to rc3.

~Andrew