From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: Prepping for GSOC 2014 [URGENT] - deadline Feb 14 2014 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:39:33 +0000 Message-ID: <53022D35.8050704@xen.org> References: <52DCE9FA.6010400@xen.org> <52E7B6AF.3050604@xen.org> <1391609348.6497.178.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <52FBA331.9040004@citrix.com> <21244.64811.826482.435714@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21244.64811.826482.435714@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Cc: Ben Guthro , Ian Campbell , Andrew Cooper , Dario Faggioli , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Paul Durrant , Santosh Jodh , "xen-api@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi all, I just combed through the list of projects, and to be honest most can be = improved. Please put yourself into the shoes of someone who a) is a student and b) has not worked on Xen before. * If you use acronyms, please point to the definitions. * If you refer to specs, please link to the specs. * If you refer to a location to the code, why not link to it. c) breaking down the project into more manageable chunks will also help Anyway, Google is reviewing applications this week. Changes to the = project page that are made this week will still make an impact. Accepted = orgs are announced on the 24th. Regards Lars On 13/02/2014 17:13, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Pau Monn=E9 writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Prepping for GSOC 2014 [URGENT= ] - deadline Feb 14 2014"): >> On 05/02/14 15:09, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> Roger: >>> * Refactor Linux hotplug scripts >>> >>> You did some of this I think? >> No, I've added a block-iscsi script, but I did not refactor the other >> ones. It is still valid, however, I'm not sure it's attractive from a >> GSoC point of view. I'm going to leave it anyway in case someone is >> interested. > Who is actually submitting our GSOC application ? > > Ian.