From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: route irqs to cpu0 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:15:15 +0000 Message-ID: <5304BC73.5090803@eu.citrix.com> References: <1390844023-23123-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.tyshchenko@globallogic.com> <52E69CBC.3090207@linaro.org> <5304B501.2010207@linaro.org> <1392818038.29739.74.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1392818038.29739.74.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Julien Grall Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, George Dunlap , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/19/2014 01:53 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 13:43 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Ping? > No one made a case for a release exception so I put it in my 4.5 pile. > >> It would be nice to have this patch for Xen 4.4 as IPI priority >> patch won't be pushed before the release. >> >> The patch is a minor change and won't impact normal use. When dom0 is >> built, Xen always do it on CPU 0. > Right, so whoever is doing otherwise already has a big pile of patches I > presume? > > It's rather late to be making such changes IMHO, but I'll defer to > George. I can't figure out from the description what's the advantage of having it in 4.4. -George