From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: route irqs to cpu0 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:59:08 +0000 Message-ID: <53073F8C.3000300@linaro.org> References: <1390844023-23123-1-git-send-email-oleksandr.tyshchenko@globallogic.com> <52E69CBC.3090207@linaro.org> <5304B501.2010207@linaro.org> <1392818038.29739.74.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5304BC73.5090803@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko , George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/21/2014 11:12 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 02/19/2014 01:53 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 13:43 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Ping? >>>> No one made a case for a release exception so I put it in my 4.5 pile. >>>> >>>>> It would be nice to have this patch for Xen 4.4 as IPI priority >>>>> patch won't be pushed before the release. >>>>> >>>>> The patch is a minor change and won't impact normal use. When dom0 is >>>>> built, Xen always do it on CPU 0. >>>> Right, so whoever is doing otherwise already has a big pile of patches I >>>> presume? >>>> >>>> It's rather late to be making such changes IMHO, but I'll defer to >>>> George. >>> >>> I can't figure out from the description what's the advantage of having it in >>> 4.4. >> >> People that use the default configuration won't see any differences but >> people that manually modify Xen to start a second domain and assign a >> device to it would. >> To give you a concrete example, it fixes a deadlock reported by >> Oleksandr Tyshchenko: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=139099606402232 > > Right -- I think if I had been cc'd when the patch was submitted, I > would have said yes for sure; but at this point I think we just want > to get 4.4.0 out without any more delays if possible. You were already CCed from the beginning :). -- Julien Grall