xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS oddness
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:31:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5318A2D8.3090808@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394121221.13270.10.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk>

On 06/03/14 15:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:47 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> By my understanding, there is no way rsp could be smaller than req, so
>> there is no point having this. Am I missing something?
>
> It happens during wraparound, i.e. after req has wrapped but rsp hasn't
> yet.

The name of the macro suggest we are interested whether the ring has 
unconsumed requests, and netback uses it that way. The answer to that 
question is req_prod - req_cons. And it works if prod wrapped but cons 
didn't.
rsp calculates the number of "consumed but not responded" requests (it 
also works well if req_cons wrapped but rsp_prod_pvt didn't), then 
subtract it from the ring size. So it gives the number of unconsumed 
responses + unconsumed requests + unused slots. Why do we care about it? 
And as it includes the number of unconsumed requests, it couldn't be 
smaller than that, could it?

Zoli

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-06 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 15:47 RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS oddness Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 15:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-06 16:31   ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2014-03-06 17:30     ` Tim Deegan
2014-03-06 21:39       ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-07  9:23         ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-07 17:43           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-07 12:02         ` Wei Liu
2014-03-07 18:58           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-11 15:55         ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-11 23:34           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 16:38       ` [PATCH RFC] xen/public/ring.h: simplify RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS() Tim Deegan
2014-03-22 14:18         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-22 17:14           ` Tim Deegan
2014-03-24  7:38             ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-24  9:39               ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-24  9:59                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-24 11:03                   ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-24 12:23               ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-24 13:52                 ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-24 23:55                   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-04-03  9:38         ` Tim Deegan
2014-04-03 15:34           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-11 15:44 ` RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS oddness Ian Campbell
2014-03-11 23:24   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 10:28     ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 10:48       ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-03-12 11:25       ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-12 11:38       ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-12 14:41         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 15:23           ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-12 15:42             ` Wei Liu
2014-03-12 15:56               ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-12 16:02               ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-12 16:13               ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 16:42                 ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-12 19:06                   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13  9:26                     ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-13 10:02                       ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:58                         ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-13 12:19                           ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 12:28                             ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 12:29                               ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-13 12:44                               ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 14:25       ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 14:27       ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 14:30         ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 15:14           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 15:37             ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 17:14               ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-12 17:43                 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 21:10                   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:04                     ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5318A2D8.3090808@citrix.com \
    --to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).