From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: How many patches are missing in upstream Linux? Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:36:55 +0000 Message-ID: <5318CE57.2050404@cantab.net> References: <53185E4D0200007800121725@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140306192610.GI9852@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLe6Q-0001Zd-Gg for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:37:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20140306192610.GI9852@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Jan Beulich , david.vrabel@citrix.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, daniel.kiper@oracle.com Cc: Yang Z Zhang , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/03/2014 19:26, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > - TS bit issue. David Vrabel was mulling this one over. (CC-ed). Er. Am I? I'm not sure what this refers to. David