From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org,
stefano.stabellini@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] xen/arm32: Introduce lookup_processor_type
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:31:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532312CF.1020906@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394807086.6442.87.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Hi Ian,
On 03/14/2014 02:24 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 12:46 +0800, Julien Grall wrote:@@ -545,6 +535,45
>> #endif /* !CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK */
>
> I got a reject here because currently this reads /* EARLY_PRINTK */. I
> presume this patch is in your queue after your other series but that
> they are actually unrelated. On that assumption I intend to resolve the
> conflict and commit... Let me know if I shouldn't do that!
There is no dependency between the both series. I should have rebase my series
before to send it, sorry.
You will find below the diff without the conflict.
Regards,
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/head.S b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/head.S
index e889596..72cda34 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/head.S
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/head.S
@@ -198,26 +198,16 @@ skip_bss:
PRINT("- Setting up control registers -\r\n")
/* Get processor specific proc info into r1 */
- mrc CP32(r0, MIDR) /* r0 := our cpu id */
- ldr r1, = __proc_info_start
- add r1, r1, r10 /* r1 := paddr of table (start) */
- ldr r2, = __proc_info_end
- add r2, r2, r10 /* r2 := paddr of table (end) */
-1: ldr r3, [r1, #PROCINFO_cpu_mask]
- and r4, r0, r3 /* r4 := our cpu id with mask */
- ldr r3, [r1, #PROCINFO_cpu_val] /* r3 := cpu val in current proc info */
- teq r4, r3
- beq 2f /* Match => exit, or try next proc info */
- add r1, r1, #PROCINFO_sizeof
- cmp r1, r2
- blo 1b
+ bl __lookup_processor_type
+ teq r1, #0
+ bne 1f
mov r4, r0
PRINT("- Missing processor info: ")
mov r0, r4
bl putn
PRINT(" -\r\n")
b fail
-2:
+1:
/* Jump to cpu_init */
ldr r1, [r1, #PROCINFO_cpu_init] /* r1 := vaddr(init func) */
@@ -545,6 +535,45 @@ putn: mov pc, lr
#endif /* !EARLY_PRINTK */
+/* This provides a C-API version of __lookup_processor_type */
+GLOBAL(lookup_processor_type)
+ stmfd sp!, {r4, r10, lr}
+ mov r10, #0 /* r10 := offset between virt&phys */
+ bl __lookup_processor_type
+ mov r0, r1
+ ldmfd sp!, {r4, r10, pc}
+
+/* Read processor ID register (CP#15, CR0), and Look up in the linker-built
+ * supported processor list. Note that we can't use the absolute addresses for
+ * the __proc_info lists since we aren't running with the MMU on (and therefore,
+ * we are not in correct address space). We have to calculate the offset.
+ *
+ * r10: offset between virt&phys
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * r0: CPUID
+ * r1: proc_info pointer
+ * Clobbers r2-r4
+ */
+__lookup_processor_type:
+ mrc CP32(r0, MIDR) /* r0 := our cpu id */
+ ldr r1, = __proc_info_start
+ add r1, r1, r10 /* r1 := paddr of table (start) */
+ ldr r2, = __proc_info_end
+ add r2, r2, r10 /* r2 := paddr of table (end) */
+1: ldr r3, [r1, #PROCINFO_cpu_mask]
+ and r4, r0, r3 /* r4 := our cpu id with mask */
+ ldr r3, [r1, #PROCINFO_cpu_val] /* r3 := cpu val in current proc info */
+ teq r4, r3
+ beq 2f /* Match => exit, or try next proc info */
+ add r1, r1, #PROCINFO_sizeof
+ cmp r1, r2
+ blo 1b
+ /* We failed to find the proc_info, return NULL */
+ mov r1, #0
+2:
+ mov pc, lr
+
/*
* Local variables:
* mode: ASM
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 4:46 [PATCH v2 0/6] xen/arm: Remove processor specific bits in Xen code Julien Grall
2014-03-05 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] xen/arm32: proc-v7.S: Rename v7_init and ACTLR_V7_SMP Julien Grall
2014-03-12 14:19 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 14:21 ` Julien Grall
2014-03-05 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] xen/arm32: head.S: Remove CA15 and CA7 specific includes Julien Grall
2014-03-05 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] xen/arm32: Introduce lookup_processor_type Julien Grall
2014-03-14 14:24 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-14 14:31 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-03-05 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] xen/arm64: Implement lookup_processor_type as a dummy function Julien Grall
2014-03-05 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] xen/arm: Remove processor specific setup in vcpu_initialise Julien Grall
2014-03-12 14:22 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-05 4:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] xen/arm: Remove asm-arm/processor-ca{15, 7}.h headers Julien Grall
2014-03-06 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] xen/arm: Remove processor specific bits in Xen code Tim Deegan
2014-03-14 15:13 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532312CF.1020906@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).